AccScience Publishing / JSE / Volume 35 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.36922/JSE026070028
ARTICLE

Passive-source localization using contrast-source time-reversal imaging with the 2D acoustic wave equation

Shuying Wei1 Guangtan Huang2* Xilin Shi2 Zhennan Yu2
Show Less
1 State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China
2 State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China
JSE 2026, 35(4), 026070028 https://doi.org/10.36922/JSE026070028
Received: 11 February 2026 | Revised: 24 April 2026 | Accepted: 2 May 2026 | Published online: 10 June 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Accurate localization of weak seismic sources remains challenging in complex media, and conventional reverse time imaging is often sensitive to noise and wavefield interference. To address these issues, we propose a two-dimensional time-domain contrast-source reverse time imaging method based on scattering theory. Using a smoothed background model as a reference, the medium perturbations were reformulated as equivalent contrast-source terms. This formulation established an explicit physical link between the scattered wavefield and medium heterogeneity, enabling efficient simulation of scattering responses. Conventional cross-correlation imaging conditions are frequently dominated by high-energy channels and amplitude imbalance among receivers. We therefore developed a grouped cross-correlation imaging condition with energy normalization. This strategy suppresses the dominance of strong-energy channels and enhances coherent stacking across different receiver azimuths, leading to improved focusing and more stable source localization. Numerical experiments were conducted on a simple scatterer model and the Marmousi velocity model. The proposed method was compared with conventional finite-difference reverse time imaging under different noise levels and multi-source scenarios. Results demonstrate that the contrast-source-based approach provided clear advantages in characterizing weak scattering signals, noise robustness, and energy focusing. The proposed grouped energy-normalized imaging condition further improved imaging resolution and source detectability. These results indicate that the proposed method is stable and adaptable in complex media, offering a promising imaging framework for microseismic and other passive-source localization. The method also shows potential for extension to three-dimensional elastic wave equations and real field data.

Keywords
Reverse time imaging
Source localization
Scattering theory
Imaging condition
Wave equation
Funding
This work was supported in part by the National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFB4007100), the National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (2024ZD1004300), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42304133 and 42574175), and the Key project from the Hubei Research Center for Basic Disciplines of Earth Sciences (HRCES-202401).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
  1. Maxwell SC, Chorney D, Goodfellow SD. Microseismic geomechanics of hydraulic-fracture networks: Insights into mechanisms of microseismic sources. Leading Edge. 2015;34(8):904-910. doi: 10.1190/TLE34080904.1
  2. Eyre TS, Eaton DW, Zecevic M, et al. Microseismicity reveals fault activation before Mw 4.1 hydraulic-fracturing induced earthquake. Geophys J Int. 2019;218(1):534-546. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggz168
  3. Geiger L. Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicentres from the arrival time only. Bull St Louis Univ. 1912;8:60-71.
  4. Waldhauser F, Ellsworth WL. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the northern Hayward fault, California. Bull Seismol Soc Am. 2000;90(6):1353-1368. doi: 10.1785/0120000006
  5. Keranen KM, Weingarten M, Abers GA, et al. Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection. Science. 2014;345(6195):448- 451. doi: 10.1126/science.1255802
  6. Sheng M, Chu R, Ni S, et al. Source parameters of three moderate size earthquakes in Weiyuan, China, and their relations to shale gas hydraulic fracturing. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2020;125(10). doi: 10.1029/2020JB019932
  7. Chu R, Sheng M. Stress features inferred from induced earthquakes in the Weiyuan shale gas block in southwestern China. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2023;128(2). doi: 10.1029/2022JB025344
  8. Gajewski D, Tessmer E. Reverse modelling for seismic event characterization. Geophys J Int. 2005;163(1):276-284. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02732.x
  9. Fink M. Time reversed acoustics. In: Wapenaar K, Draganov D, Robertsson JOA, Pelissier MA, eds. Seismic Interferometry: History and Present Status. Vol 26. Tulsa, OK: Society of Exploration Geophysicists; 2008. doi: 10.1190/1.9781560801924
  10. Lin Y, Zhang H. Imaging hydraulic fractures by microseismic migration for downhole monitoring system. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016. Society of Exploration Geophysicists; 2016. doi: 10.1190/segam2016-13973310.1
  11. Li L, Tan J, Schwarz B, et al. Recent advances and challenges of waveform‐based seismic location methods at multiple scales. Rev Geophys. 2020;58(1):e2019RG000667. doi: 10.1029/2019RG000667
  12. Miao SY, Zhang HJ, Tan YY, et al. Development of a new high resolution waveform migration location method and its applications to induced seismicity. Earth Planet Phys. 2021;5(6):520-531. doi: 10.26464/epp2021056
  13. Artman B, Podladtchikov I, Witten B. Source location using time‐reverse imaging. Geophys Prospect. 2010;58(5):861- 873. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00911.x
  14. Douma J, Snieder R. Focusing of elastic waves for microseismic imaging. Geophys J Int. 2014;200(1):390-401. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu398
  15. Wu S, Wang Y, Zheng Y, et al. Microseismic source locations with deconvolution migration. Geophys J Int. 2018;212(3):2088-2115. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggx518
  16. Eaton DW. Weak elastic-wave scattering from massive sulfide orebodies. Geophysics. 1999;64(1):289-299. doi: 10.1190/1.1444525
  17. Huang L, Fehler MC, Roberts PM, et al. Extended local Rytov Fourier migration method. Geophysics. 1999;64(5):1535- 1545. doi: 10.1190/1.1444657
  18. Li X. Scattering of seismic waves in arbitrarily heterogeneous and acoustic media: A general solution and simulations. Geophys Res Lett. 2001;28(15):3003-3006. doi: 10.1029/2000GL012658
  19. Lam CH, Bakrac S, van den Berg PM, et al. On the background model for non‐linear inversion of seismic data. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2006. Texas, TX: Society of Exploration Geophysicists; 2006:2012-2016. doi: 10.1190/1.2369931
  20. Jakobsen M. T-matrix approach to seismic forward modelling in the acoustic approximation. Stud Geophys Geod. 2012;56(1):1-20. doi: 10.1007/s11200-010-9081-2
  21. Osnabrugge G, Leedumrongwatthanakun S, Vellekoop IM. A convergent Born series for solving the inhomogeneous Helmholtz equation in arbitrarily large media. J Comput Phys. 2016;322:113-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.06.034
  22. Huang L, Fehler M, Zheng Y, et al. Seismic-Wave Scattering, Imaging, and Inversion. Commun Comput Phys. 2020;28(1):1-40. doi: 10.4208/cicp.2020.swsii.review
  23. Abubakar A, Hu W, Habashy TM, et al. Application of the finite-difference contrast-source inversion algorithm to seismic full-waveform data. Geophysics. 2009;74(6):WCC47- WCC58. doi: 10.1190/1.3250203
  24. Abubakar A, Pan G, Li M, et al. Three‐dimensional seismic full‐waveform inversion using the finite‐difference contrast source inversion method. Geophys Prospect. 2011;59:874- 888. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00953.x
  25. Han B, He Q, Chen Y, et al. Seismic waveform inversion using the finite‐difference contrast source inversion method. J Appl Math. 2014;2014(1):532159. doi: 10.1155/2014/532159
  26. He Q, Han B, Chen Y, et al. Application of the finite-difference contrast source inversion method to multiparameter reconstruction using seismic full-waveform data. J Appl Geophys. 2016;124:4-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.10.011
  27. Abubakar A, Hu W, van Den Berg PM, et al. A finite-difference contrast source inversion method. Inverse Probl. 2008;24(6):065004. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/24/6/065004
  28. Salucci M, Poli L, Lusa S, et al. Recent Advances in Multiscale- Multiphysics Inverse Scattering. In: 2024 18th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP). IEEE; 2024:1-4. doi: 10.23919/EuCAP60739.2024.10501373
  29. Tan Y, He C, Mao Z. Microseismic velocity model inversion and source location: The use of neighborhood algorithm and master station method. Geophysics. 2018;83(4):KS49-KS63. doi: 10.1190/geo2017-0308.1
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing