ARTICLE

Physical model study of reflection pitfalls and anisotropy parameter estimation in a transversely isotropic medium

CHIH-HSIUNG CHANG1 YOUNG-FO CHANG2 PO-YEN TSENG2 CHAO-MING LIN3
Show Less
1 General Education Centre, Centre of Energy Research and Sensor Technology, National Chiayi University, Chiayi 60004, Taiwan. charles@mail.nccu.edu.tw,
2 Institute of Seismology, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi 62102, Taiwan.,
3 Department of Electronic Engineering, Hsiuping Institute of Technology, Taichung 41280, Taiwan.,
JSE 2016, 25(5), 399–418;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Chang, C.-H., Chang, Y.-F., Tseng, P.-Y. and Lin, C.-M., 2016. Physical model study of reflection pitfalls and anisotropy parameter estimation in a transversely isotropic medium. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 25: 399-418. Imaging problems due to velocity anisotropy were investigated using forward modelling. Zero-offset and constant-offset reflection experiments were performed to image spherical domes that were carved into the bottom of VTI and HTI models, respectively, along three different layout directions. Subject to velocity anisotropy, the spherical dome was projected as laterally stretched images. The curvature radius of the spherical dome was increasingly imaged in the seismic profiles due to polar velocity variation in the VTI model. An ellipsoidal dome was detected in the HTI model, instead of a spheroidal dome, due to azimuthal velocity variation. To address the problems of erroneous images in reflections, laboratory data were processed by anisotropic 2D Kirchhoff migration. Although true images were not satisfactorily restored, the effects of 'lateral stretch' were significantly reduced. Due to azimuthal velocity variations, Common Depth Point (CDP) reflections acquired from different azimuths on the horizontal symmetry axis plane of the HTI model cannot be well-tied. Making use of the 'mis-tie' in the CDP, which was observed in the profiles, the feasibility of estimating the Thomsen’s P-wave anisotropy parameter (€) was evaluated. Although the physical models used are relatively simple, erroneous images caused by velocity anisotropy were confirmed, and the prospect of estimating the P-wave anisotropy parameter (€) from arrival time difference was addressed.

Keywords
modelling
anisotropy
reflection
image
migration
CDP
References
  1. Chang, C.H. and Chang, Y.F., 2003. A simplified nonhyperbolic moveout formula for a
  2. transversely isotropic medium. TAO, 14: 99-112.
  3. Cheng, J.B., Wang, T.F., Wang, C.L. and Geng, J.H., 2012. Azimuth-preserved local
  4. angle-domain prestack time migration in isotropic, vertical transversely isotropic and
  5. azimuthally anisotropic media. Geophysics, 77: $51-S64.
  6. Claerbout, J., 1997. Introduction to Kirchhoff Migration Programs. Stanford Exploration Project,
  7. Report 73: 385-391.
  8. Dellinger, J. and Vernik, L., 1994. Do traveltimes in pulse-transmission experiments yield
  9. anisotropic group or phase velocity? Geophysics, 59: 1774-1779.
  10. French, W.S., 1974. 2-D and 3-D migration of model-experiment reflection profiles. Geophysics,
  11. 39: 265-277.
  12. Grechka, V., Theophanis, S$. and Tsvankin, I., 1999. Joint inversion of P- and PS-waves in
  13. orthorhombic media: Theory and a physical modeling study. Geophysics, 64: 146-161.
  14. Holt, R., 2006. Constraining anisotropy - Lessons from 2D modeling. Abstr., CSEG-CWLS
  15. Convent.: 296-299.
  16. 418 CHANG, CHANG, TSENG & LIN
  17. Helbig. K., and Thomsen. L., 2005. 75-plus years of anisotropy in exploration and reservoir
  18. seismics: A historical review of concepts and methods. Geophysics, 70: 9ND-23ND.
  19. Isaac, J.-H. and Lawton, D.C., 1999. Image mispositioning due to dipping TI media: A physical
  20. seismic modeling study. Geophysics, 64: 1230-1238.
  21. Mah, M. and Schmitt, D.R., 2003. Determination of the complete elastic stiffnesses from ultrasonic
  22. phase velocity measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 108: ECV 6-1—6-11.
  23. doi: 10. 1029/2001jb001586.
  24. Martin, D., Ehinger, A. and Rasolofosaon, P., 1992. Some aspects of seismic modeling and imaging
  25. in anisotropic media using laser ultrasonics. Expanded Abstr., 62nd Ann. Internat. SEG
  26. Mtg., New Orleans: 1373-1376. doi: 10.1190/1.1821998
  27. Okoye, P.N., Uren, N.F., McDonald, J.A. and Ebrom, D.A., 1995. The dependence of lateral
  28. resolution on the orientation of symmetry axis and elastic parameter in transversely isotropic
  29. media. Expanded Abstr., 65th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 567-571.
  30. doi: 10.1190/1.1887425.
  31. Okoye, P.N. and Uren, N.F., 2000. Fresnel zones and spatial resolution for P- and SH-waves in
  32. transversely isotropic media. Geophysics, 65: 1168-1178. doi: 10.1190/1.1444810.
  33. Sullivan, M.F. and Cohen, J.K., 1987. Prestack Kirchhoff inversion of common-offset data.
  34. Geophysics, 52: 745-754. doi: 10.1190/1.1442341
  35. Thomsen, L., 2002. Understanding Seismic Anisotropy in Exploration and Exploitation. SEG-EAGE
  36. Distinguished Instructor Series, 5. SEG, Tulsa, OK.
  37. Vestrum, R.W. and Fowler, P.J., 2005. Quantifying imaging and position problems beneath TT]
  38. media. Extended Abstr., 67th EAGE Conf., Madrid: E026.
  39. Vestrum, R. and Lawton, D., 2010. Reflection point sideslip and smear in imaging below dipping
  40. anisotropic media. Geophys. Prosp., 58: 541-548.
  41. Waluyo, W., Uren, N.F. and McDonald, J.A., 1995. Poisson’s ratio in transversely isotropic media
  42. and its effects on amplitude response: An investigation through physical modelling
  43. experiments. Expanded Abstr., 65th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 585-588.
  44. Wild, P., 2011. Practical applications of seismic anisotropy. First Break, 29: 117-124.
  45. Yilmaz, O., 1987. Migration and ambient noise. In: Doherty, $.M. (Ed.), Seismic Data Processing.
  46. SEG, Tulsa, OK: 324-328.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing