ARTICLE

The application of PSO to joint inversion of microtremor Rayleigh waves dispersion curves and refraction traveltimes

R. POORMIRZAEI R. HAMIDZADEH MOGHADAM A. ZAREAN
Show Less
Faculty of Mining Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran.,
Department of Civil Engineering, Shabestar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shabestar, Iran.,
JSE 2015, 24(4), 305–325;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Poormirzaee, R.. Hamidzadeh Moghadam, R. and Zarean, A.. 2015. The application of PSO to joint inversion of microtremor Rayleigh waves dispersion curves and refraction traveltimes. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 24: 305-325. The accurate estimation of shear wave velocity (Vs) by Rayleigh wave dispersion analyses is very important for geotechnical and earthquake engineering studies, but dispersion curve inversion is challenging for most inversion methods due to its high nonlinearity and mix-determined trait. In order to overcome these problems, the current study proposes a joint inversion scheme based on a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Seismic data considered for designing the objects were the Rayleigh wave dispersion curve and seismic refraction traveltime. For joint inversion, the objective functions were combined into a single function. The proposed algorithm was tested on two synthetic datasets and also on an experimental dataset. Synthetic models demonstrated that the joint inversion of Rayleigh wave and traveltime returned a more accurate estimation of Vs compared with single inversion Rayleigh wave dispersion curves. To verify the applicability of the proposed method, it was applied at a sample site in Tabriz city. northwestern Iran. For a real dataset. the refraction microtremor (ReMi) was used as a passive method for obtaining Rayleigh wave dispersion curves. Using PSO joint inversion, a three-layer subsurface mode] was delineated: the first layer’s velocity was 316 m/s and its thickness was 5.5 m, the second layer’s velocity was 280 m/s and its thickness was 2.8 m, and the last layer’s velocity was 512 m/s. The results of synthetic datasets and the field dataset showed that the proposed joint inversion technique significantly reduces the uncertainties of inverted models and improves the revelation of boundaries.

Keywords
joint inversion
Rayleigh wave
dispersion curves
traveltime
PSO
refraction microtremor
References
  1. Carlisle, A. and Dozier, G.. 2001. An off-the-shelf PSO. Proc. of the 2001 Workshop On particle
  2. Swarm Optimization, Indianapolis: 1-6.
  3. Cha, Y.H., Kang, J.S. and Jo. C.H, 2006. Application of linear-array microtremor surveys for rock
  4. mass classification in urban tunnel design. Explor. Geophys., 37: 108-113.
  5. Clerc, M., 1999. The swarm and the queen: towards a deterministic and adaptive particle swarm
  6. optimization. In: Angeline, P.J., Michalewicz, Z., Schoenauer, M., Yao, X. and Zalzala,
  7. A. (Eds.), Proc. of the Congress of Evolutionary Computation. IEEE Press: 1951-1957.
  8. Clerc, M.A. and Kennedy, J., 2002. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in
  9. a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Transact. Evolution. Computat., 6: 58-73.
  10. Coccia, $., Del Gaudio, V., Venisti, N. and Wasowski, N., 2010. Application of Refraction
  11. Microtremor (ReMi) technique for determination of 1-D shear wave velocity in a landslide
  12. area. J. Appl. Geophys., 71: 71-89.
  13. Coello, C.A., Pulido, G.T. and Lechuga, M.A., 2004. Handling multiple objectives with particle
  14. swarm optimization. IEEE Transact. Evolution. Computat., 8(3): 23-38.
  15. Dal Moro, G., 2008. Vs and V, vertical profiling via joint inversion of Rayleigh waves and
  16. refraction traveltimes by means of bi-objective evolutionary algorithm. J. Appl. Geophys.,
  17. 66: 15-24.
  18. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratab, A. and Meyarivan, T., 2000. A fast elitist nondominated sorting
  19. genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Proc. Parallel Problem
  20. Solving From Nature VI Conf.: 849-858.
  21. Evers, G.1., 2009. An Automatic Regrouping Mechanism to Deal with Stagnation in Particle Swarm
  22. Optimization. M.Sc. thesis, Univ. of Texas-Pan American.
  23. Fernandez Martinez, J.L., Garcia Gonzalo, E., Fernandez Alvarez, J.P., Kuzma, H.A and
  24. Menéndez Pérez, C.O., 2010a. PSO: a powerful algorithm to solve geophysical inverse
  25. problems: application to a 1D-DC resistivity case. J. Appl. Geophys., 71: 13-25.
  26. Fernandez Martinez, J.L., Garcia Gonzalo, E., Fernandez Muiiz, Z., Mariethoz, G. and Mukerji.
  27. T., 2010b. Posterior sampling using particle swarm optimizers and model reduction
  28. techniques. Internat. J. Appl. Evolution. Computat., 1(3): 27-48.
  29. Foti, S., Sambuelli, L., Socco, V.L. and Strobbia, C., 2003. Experiments of joint acquisition of
  30. seismic refraction and surface wave data. Near Surf. Geophys., 3: 119-129.
  31. Garcia, Ch., Kang, F.J. and Tae-Seob, K., 2014. Lateral heterogeneities and microtremors:
  32. Limitations of HVSR and SPAC based studies for site response. Engineer. Geol.,
  33. doi: 10.1016/j.
  34. Gardner, G.F., Gardner, L-W. and Gregory, A.R., 1974. Formation velocity and density the
  35. diagnostic basic for stratigraphic trap. Geophysics, 39: 770-780.
  36. Golpasand, M.B., Nikudel, M.R. and Uromeihy, A., 2013. Predicting the occurrence of mixed face
  37. conditions in tunnel route of Line 2 Tabriz metro, Tabriz, Iran. In; Wu, F. and Qi, S.,
  38. (Eds. ), Global View of Engineering Geology and the Environment. Taylor & Francis Group,
  39. London.
  40. Hering, A.. Misiek, R., Gyulai, A., Ormos. T., Dobroka, M. and Dresen, L.. 1995. A joint
  41. inversion algorithm to process geoelectric and sutface wave seismic data, Part 1: basic ideas.
  42. Geophys. Prosp., 43: 135-156.
  43. Journal_SEISMIC_No24-4:JOURNAL SEISMIC 11-06 24/086 14:23 Page325
  44. INVERSION OF RAYLEIGH WAVES 325
  45. Herrmann, R.B., 1987. Computer Programs in Seismology, User’s Manual II. St. Louis University,
  46. St. Louis, MS.
  47. Kearey, P., Brooks, M. and Hill, I.. 2002. An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration. Blackwell
  48. Publications, Oxford.
  49. Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R.C., 1995. Particle swarm optimization. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf.
  50. Neural Netw., Perth, Piscataway, Australia: 1942-1948.
  51. Louie, J.N., 2001. Faster, better: shear wave velocity to 100 meters depth from refraction
  52. microtremor arrays. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 91: 347-364.
  53. Mahajan, A.K., Mundepi, A.K., Chauhan, N., Jasrotia, A.S., Rai, N. and Gachhayat, T.K., 2012.
  54. Active seismic and passive microtremor HVSR for assessing site effects in Jammu city, NW
  55. Himalaya, India, A case study. J. Appl. Geophys., 77: 51-62.
  56. Panzera. F. and Lombardo, G., 2013. Seismic property characterization of lithotypes cropping out
  57. in the Siracusa urban area, Italy. Engin. Geol., 153: 12-24.
  58. Peksen, E., Yas, T.A., Kayman, Y. and fzkan, C., 2011. Application of particle swarm
  59. optimization on self-potential data. J. Appl. Geophys., 75: 305-318.
  60. Poormirzaee, R. and Hamidzadeh, R.M., 2014. Determination of S-wave structure via refraction
  61. microtremor technique in urban area: a case study. J. Tethys, 2: 347-356.
  62. Poormirzaee, R., Hamidzadeh, R.M. and Zarean, A., 2014a. Inversion seismic refraction data using
  63. particle swarm optimization: a case study of Tabriz, Iran. Arab. J. Geosci., in press.
  64. DOI: 10. 1007/s12517-014-1662-x.
  65. Poormirzaee, R., Hamidzadeh, R.M. and Zarean, A., 2014b. PSO: a powerful and fast intelligence
  66. optimization method in processing of passive geophysical data. Proc. Internat. Conf. Swarm
  67. Intellig. Based Optimiz., Mulhouse, France: 12-19.
  68. Rucker, M.L., 2003. Applying the refraction microtremor (ReMi) shear wave technique to
  69. geotechnical characterization. Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. Applic. Geophys. Methodol., 8-12.
  70. Schutte, J.F. and Groenwold, A.A., 2005. A study of global optimization using particle swarms.
  71. J. Global Optimiz., 31: 93-108.
  72. Scott, J.B., Clark, M., Rennie, T., Pancha, A., Park, H. and Louie, J.N., 2004. A shallow
  73. shear-wave velocity transect across the Reno, Nevada, area basin. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.,
  74. 94; 2222-2228.
  75. Seislmager/SW Manual, 2009. Windows Software for Analysis of Surface Waves. Version 3.0.
  76. http://www. geometrics.com.
  77. Shi, Y. and Eberhart, R.C., 1998. A modified particle swarm optimizer. Proc. [EEE Internat. Conf.
  78. Evolution. Computat., Piscataway, NJ: 69-73.
  79. Srinivas, N. and Deb, K., 1994. Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic
  80. algorithms. Evol. Comput., 2: 221-248.
  81. Stephenson, W.J., Louie, J.N., Pullammanappallil, $., Williams, R.A. and Odum, J.K., 2005. Blind
  82. shear-wave velocity comparison of ReMi and MASW results with boreholes to 200 m in
  83. Santa Clara Valley. Implications for earthquake ground-motion assessment. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.
  84. 95: 2506-2516.
  85. Trelea, I.C., 2003. The particle swarm optimization algorithm: Convergence analysis and parameter
  86. selection. Informat. Process. Lett., 85: 317-325.
  87. Xia, J., Miller, R.D. and Park, C.B., 1999. Estimation of near-surface shear-wave velocity by
  88. inversion of Rayleigh waves. Geophysics, 64: 691-700.
  89. Yang, X.S., 2010. Engineering Optimization, Introduction with Metaheuristic Applications. John
  90. Wiley & Sons, New York: 19-22.
  91. Zarean, A., Mirzaei, N. and Mirzaei, M., 2015. Applying MPSO for building shear wave velocity
  92. models from microtremor Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves. J. Seismic Explor., 24: 51-82.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing