Cite this article
1
Download
7
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Numerical study of combined modulated electromagnetic wave parameters in forward modeling of reflected seismic waves from subsurface layers

MARYAM NOROOZI1 MOHAMMAD ALI RIAHI1 ALI BOSTANI2
Show Less
1 Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.,
2 CEO at BEM Technology Group, Tehran, Iran.,
JSE 2023, 32(4), 357–372;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Noroozi, M., Riahi, M.A. and Bostani, A., 2023. Numerical study of combined modulated electromagnetic wave parameters in forward modeling of reflected seismic waves from subsurface layers. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 32: 357-372. Nowadays, a combination of different methods are implemented for identifying subsurface reserves with the aim of increasing accuracy and reducing failure costs. In exploration geophysics, electromagnetic methods with a controlled source are used in and and sea environments to study subsurface structures. On the other hand, seismic methods are traditionally the most common method for hydrocarbon explorations. In this study, a combination of the two methods is used. As usual for solving electromagnetic wave equations, the dielectric coefficient parameter is assumed to be constant. But here the electromagnetic wave equations are solved by considering the dielectric coefficient parameter, resulting in a higher accuracy in identifying the subsurface layers. The importance of the dielectric coefficient parameter is that the value of this parameter for oil and gas with its value for the host rock surrounding the oil and gas trap is significantly different, therefore it facilitates the exploration process. Also in our numerical modeling, we used a wave packet which includes a sinusoidal wave and a square wave that is propagated into the Earth model in a modulated form. Those waves have different wavelengths because waves with long wavelengths can penetrate deeper while waves with short wavelengths result in more resolution. 0963-065 1/23/$5.00 © 2023 Geohysical Press Ltd. 358 We used the Marmousi2 model which is made up of several hydrocarbon sections including the Marmousi hydrocarbon section. Then, using the empirical relationship between seismic velocity and the resistivity parameter we extracted the dielectric coefficient parameter. According to the lithological information we produced a dielectric coefficient matrix. Finally, with this information, we made a numerical forward modeling code to generate the final output of this model which is the intensity of the ground- induced reflected fields received by the receivers. Then a forward model for the seismological method was prepared and the output related to the reflection coefficient was obtained for this model. The comparison of these two outputs with 3 methods, consisting of the mean squared error, structural similarity index, and histogram chart. we observe that when using the joint method, the results of the properties of the layers are obtained more accurately than when using the conventional seismic method alone.

Keywords
seismic method
electromagnetic method
dielectric coefficient
Marmousi2 model
reflection coefficient
mean squared error
structural similarity index
References
  1. Bostani, A., 2020. BEM, Broadband Electromagnetic Smart Method, Phenomenology,
  2. Theory, Applications. EAGE Mineral Explorat. Symp., 17-18 September.
  3. Jackson, J.D., 1998. Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  4. Kosloff, D.D. and Baysal, E., 1982. Forward modeling by a Fourier method.
  5. Geophysics, 47: 1402-1412.
  6. Martin, G.S., 2004. The Marmousi2 model, elastic synthetic data, and analysis of
  7. imaging and AVO in a structurally complex environment. Ph.D. Thesis,
  8. University of Houston.
  9. Meju, M.A., Gallardo, L.A. and Mohamed, A.K., 2003. Evidence for correlation of
  10. electrical resistivity and seismic velocity in heterogeneous near-surface materials.
  11. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30: 1373.
  12. Takougang, E.M.T., Harris, B., Kepic, A. and Le, C.V.A., 2015. Cooperative joint
  13. inversion of 3D seismic and magnetotelluric data: With application in a mineral
  14. province. Geophysics, 80(4): R175-R187.
  15. doi.org/10.1190/GEO2014-0252.1.
  16. Wang, Z., Zhou, C., Zhao, S., Xu, X., Liu, M., Liu, Y., Liao, L. and Shen, X., 2021.
  17. Numerical study of global elf electromagnetic wave propagation with respect to
  18. lithosphere atmosphere ionosphere coupling, Remote Sens., 13: 4107.
  19. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13204 107.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing