Determination of reflection coefficients by comparison of direct and reflected VSP events

Lira, J.E., Weglein, A.B., Bird, C.W. and Innanen, K.A., 2012. Determination of reflection coefficients by comparison of direct and reflected VSP events. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 21: 361-376. VSP experiments provide a much greater opportunity to estimate local reflectivity information than do surface-constrained experiments. In this paper we describe a simple, data driven means by which the reflection coefficient associated with an interface at depth, uncontaminated by transmission losses, may be determined, regardless of the origins of these losses or of the overburden parameters associated with them. An amplitude correction operator is formed through a comparison of the direct and reflected waves just above a generating interface. Error grows as the distance above the generating interface at which the two events are compared grows. The formulation of the problem is in the plane-wave domain, but with a slight additional error the approach can be applied to data associated with fixed zero or nonzero offset. The method can be applied to generate scalar reflectivity values in acoustic/elastic environments, or phase and amplitude spectra of reflectivities in anacoustic/attenuative environments. A field data example from the Ross Lake heavy oil field in Saskatchewan, Canada illustrates the method. Our sense is that these results indicate applicability to more complex geometries, walkway or 3D VSP surveys, assisting with the construction of AVO/AVA panels.
- Aki, K. and Richards, P.G., 2002. Quantitative Seismology, 2nd Ed. University Science Books,
- Sausalito, California.
- Araujo, F.V., Weglein, A.B., Carvalho, P.M. and Stolt, R.H., 1994. Inverse scattering series for
- multiple attenuation: An example with surface and internal multiples. Expanded Abstr., 64th
- Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Los Angeles: 1039-1041.
- Carvalho, P.M., 1992. Free-surface Multiple Reflection Elimination Method Based on Non-linear
- Inversion of Seismic Data. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Bahia, Brazil.
- Chopra, S., Alexeev, V., Manerikar, A. and Kryzan, A., 2004. Acquisitions/Processing
- Processing/Integration of simultaneously acquired 3D surface seismic and 3D VSP data. The
- Leading Edge, 23: 422-430.
- Dewangan, P. and Grechka, V., 2002. Inversion of multicomponent, multiazimuth, walkaway VSP
- data for the stiffness tensor. Expanded Abstr., 72nd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Salt Lake
- City: 161-164.
- Grechka, V. and Mateeva, A., 2007. Inversion of P-wave VSP data for local anisotropy: Theory
- and case study. Geophysics, 72: D69-D79.
- Hardage, B.A., 1985. Vertical Seismic Profiling, Part A: Principles, 2nd Ed. Geophysical Press,
- Ltd., London.
- Hauge, P.S., 1981. Measurements of attenuation from vertical seismic profiles. Geophysics, 46:
- 1548-1558.
- He, R., Karrenbach, M., Paulsson, B. and Soutryne, V., 2009. Near-wellbore VSP imaging
- without overburden. Geophysics, 74: SI9-SI14.
- Hinds, R.C., Anderson, N.L. and Kuzmiski, R.D., 1996. VSP Interpretive Processing: Theory and
- Practice. SEG, Tulsa, OK.
- Kommedal, J.H. and Tjostheim, B.A., 1989. A study of different methods of wavefield separation
- for application to VSP data. Geophys. Prosp., 37: 117-142.
- Kuzmiski, R., Charters, B. and Galbraith, M., 2009. Processing considerations for 3D VSP.
- Recorder, 34: 30-40.
- Leaney, W.S., Sayers, C.M. and Miller, D.E., 1999. Analysis of multiazimuthal VSP data for
- anisotropy and AVO. Geophysics, 64: 1172-1180.
- Lira, J.E.M., Innanen, K.A., Weglein, A.B. and Ramirez, A.C., 2010. Correction of primary
- amplitudes for plane-wave transmission loss through an acoustic or absorptive overburden
- with the inverse scattering series internal multiple attenuation algorithm: an initial study and
- 1D numerical examples. J. Seismic Explor., 19: 19-34.
- Omnes, G. and Heprenschmidt, A., 1992. Use of VSP data for P- and S-wave attenuation studies
- in a fractured reservoir. Expanded Abstr., 62nd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., New Orleans:
- 148-150.
- Owusu, J.C. and Mubarak, M., 2009. High-fidelity walkaround VSP anisotropy analysis. The
- Leading Edge, 28: 966-972.
- Ramirez, A.C., 2007. I - Inverse scattering subseries for 1: Removal of internal multiples and 2:
- Depth imaging primaries; II - Green’s theorem as the foundation of interferometry and
- guiding new practical methods and applications. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Houston.
- Verschuur, D.J., Berkhout, A.J. and Wapenaar, C.P.A., 1992. Adaptive surface-related multiple
- elimination. Geophysics, 57: 1166-1177.
- Weglein, A.B., Liu, F., Li, X., Terenghi, P., Kragh, E., Mayhan, J.D., Wang, Z., Mispel, J.,
- Amundsen, L., Liang, H., Tang, L. and Hsu, S.-Y., 2012. Inverse scattering series direct
- depth imaging without the velocity model: first field data examples. J. Seismic Explor., 21:
- 1-28.
- Xiao, X., Zhou, M. and Schuster, G.T., 2006. Salt-flank delineation by interferometric imaging of
- transmitted P- to S-waves. Geophysics, 71: SI197-SI207.
- Zhang, Z., 2010. Assessing attenuation, fractures, and anisotropy using logs, vertical seismic
- profile, and three-component seismic data: heavy oilfield and potash mining examples. Ph.D.
- Thesis, University of Calgary, Alberta.