ARTICLE

Model-based comparison of 3D volumetric curvature and coherence with a co-rendering application

XUEHUA CHEN1,2 WEI YANG2 ZHENHUA HE2 WENLI ZHONG3
Show Less
1 State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, #1 Erxianqiao Dongsan Road, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, P.R. China.,
2 College of Geophysics, Chengdu University of Technology, #1 Erxianqiao Dongsan Road, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, P.R. China.,
3 College of Earth Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, #1 Erxianqiao Dongsan Road, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, P.R. China.,
JSE 2012, 21(1), 83–102;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Chen, X., Yang, W., He, Z. and Zhong, W., 2012. Model-based comparison of 3D volumetric curvature and coherence with a co-rendering application. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 21: 000-102. Coherence and curvatures are both important attributes for the delineation of geological features of interest in seismic data. To clarify the response of these attributes to different geological features and to better integrate them into seismic interpretation, we first presented an algorithm of 3D volumetric curvature. Next, by using two modified 'French' models to simulate a variety of typical geological features, we compare the spatial relationships between geological anomalies of interest and the response of these two types of attributes; in doing so, we visually analyze the differences and similarities between these attributes. Then, by discriminately manipulating the transparency of different values in these two attributes, a combined visualization of co-rendered 3D volumetric curvature with coherence is introduced. The work presented in this paper provides a better understanding of these attributes and the spatial relationships between these attributes and geological features in real seismic data. Field data examples demonstrate that the co-rendering method can effectively communicate information, fully extract and highlight geological anomalies, and attenuate the noisy background in these attributes.

Keywords
3D volumetric curvature
coherence
attributes co-rendering
geologic model
fault detection
References
  1. Al-Dossary, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2006. 3D volumetric multispectral estimates of reflector curvature
  2. and rotation. Geophysics, 71: P41-P51.
  3. Bahorich, M. and Farmer, $.L., 1995. 3-D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features:
  4. the coherence cube. The Leading Edge, 14: 1053-1058.
  5. Barnes, A.E., 1996. Theory of 2-D complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics, 61: 264-272.
  6. Blumentritt, C.H., Marfurt, K.J. and Sullivan, E.C., 2006. Volume-based curvature computations
  7. illuminate fracture orientations-Early to mid-Paleozoic, Central Basin Platform, West Texas.
  8. Geophysics, 71: P41-P51.
  9. Buck, D.M., Alam, A. and Taylor, J.D., 2007. Fractured reservoir prediction from 3D seismic
  10. volumetric curvature and low frequency imaging. Expanded Abstr., 77th Ann. Internat. SEG
  11. Mtg., San Antonio: 422-426.
  12. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2007. Seismic Attributes for Prospect Identification and Reservoir
  13. Characterization. SEG, Tulsa, USA.
  14. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2007. Curvature attribute applications to 3D surface seismic data. The
  15. Leading Edge, 26: 404-414.
  16. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2007. Volumetric curvature attributes add value to 3D seismic data
  17. interpretation. The Leading Edge, 26: 856-867.
  18. 102 CHEN, YANG, HE & ZHONG
  19. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2008. Emerging and future trends in seismic attributes: The Leading
  20. Edge, 27: 298-318.
  21. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2009. Detecting stratigraphic features via crossplotting of seismic
  22. discontinuity attributes and their volume visualization. The Leading Edge, 28: 1422-1426.
  23. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2010a. Integration of coherence and volumetric curvature images. The
  24. Leading Edge, 29: 1092-1106.
  25. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2010b. Delineating fractures from seismic attributes. Search and
  26. Discovery Article #110124.
  27. Claerbout, J.F., 1976. Fundamentals of Geophysical Data Processing. McGraw-Hill Book Company,
  28. New York.
  29. Flierman, W., Weide, J.G., Wever, A., Brouwer, F. and Huck, A., 2008. Use of spatial, frequency
  30. and curvature attributes for reservoir, fluid and contact predictions. Expanded Abstr., 78th
  31. Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Las Vegas: 1521-1525.
  32. French, W.S., 1974. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional migration of model-experiment
  33. reflection profiles. Geophysics, 39: 265-277.
  34. Gersztenkorn, A. and Marfurt, K.J., 1999. Eigenstructure-based coherence computations as an aid
  35. to 3-D structural and stratigraphic mapping. Geophysics, 64: 1468-1479.
  36. Hart, B.S., 2002. Validating seismic attributes: Beyond statistics. The Leading Edge, 21: 1016-1021.
  37. Klein, P., Richard, L. and James, H., 2008. 3D curvature attributes: a new approach for seismic
  38. interpretation. First Break, 26: 105-112.
  39. Lisle, R.J., 1994. Detection of zones of abnormal strains in structures using Gaussian curvature
  40. analysis. AAPG Bull., 78: 1811-1819.
  41. Luo, Y., Higgs, W.G. and Kowalik, W.S., 1996. Edge detection and stratigraphic analysis using
  42. 3D seismic data. Expanded Abstr., 66th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Denver: 324-327.
  43. Mai, H.T., Marfurt, K.J. and Chavez-Pérez, S., 2009. Coherence and volumetric curvatures and
  44. their spatial relationship to faults and folds, an example from Chicontepec basin, Mexico.
  45. Expanded Abstr., 79th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 1063-1067.
  46. Marfurt, K.J., Kirlin, R.L., Farmer, S. and Bahorich, M., 1998. 3-D seismic attributes using a
  47. semblance-based coherency algorithm. Geophysics, 63: 1150-1165.
  48. Marfurt, K.J., Sudhaker, V., Gersztenkorn, A., Crawford, K.D. and Nissen, S.E., 1999. Coherency
  49. calculations in the presence of structural dip. Geophysics, 64: 104-111.
  50. Marfurt, K.J., 2006. Robust estimates of 3D reflector dip and azimuth. Geophysics, 71: P29-P40.
  51. Roberts, A., 2001. Curvature attributes and their application to 3D interpreted horizons. First Break,
  52. 19: 85-100.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing