Model-based comparison of 3D volumetric curvature and coherence with a co-rendering application

Chen, X., Yang, W., He, Z. and Zhong, W., 2012. Model-based comparison of 3D volumetric curvature and coherence with a co-rendering application. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 21: 000-102. Coherence and curvatures are both important attributes for the delineation of geological features of interest in seismic data. To clarify the response of these attributes to different geological features and to better integrate them into seismic interpretation, we first presented an algorithm of 3D volumetric curvature. Next, by using two modified 'French' models to simulate a variety of typical geological features, we compare the spatial relationships between geological anomalies of interest and the response of these two types of attributes; in doing so, we visually analyze the differences and similarities between these attributes. Then, by discriminately manipulating the transparency of different values in these two attributes, a combined visualization of co-rendered 3D volumetric curvature with coherence is introduced. The work presented in this paper provides a better understanding of these attributes and the spatial relationships between these attributes and geological features in real seismic data. Field data examples demonstrate that the co-rendering method can effectively communicate information, fully extract and highlight geological anomalies, and attenuate the noisy background in these attributes.
- Al-Dossary, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2006. 3D volumetric multispectral estimates of reflector curvatureand rotation. Geophysics, 71: P41-P51.
- Bahorich, M. and Farmer, $.L., 1995. 3-D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic features:the coherence cube. The Leading Edge, 14: 1053-1058.
- Barnes, A.E., 1996. Theory of 2-D complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics, 61: 264-272.
- Blumentritt, C.H., Marfurt, K.J. and Sullivan, E.C., 2006. Volume-based curvature computationsilluminate fracture orientations-Early to mid-Paleozoic, Central Basin Platform, West Texas.Geophysics, 71: P41-P51.
- Buck, D.M., Alam, A. and Taylor, J.D., 2007. Fractured reservoir prediction from 3D seismicvolumetric curvature and low frequency imaging. Expanded Abstr., 77th Ann. Internat. SEGMtg., San Antonio: 422-426.
- Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2007. Seismic Attributes for Prospect Identification and ReservoirCharacterization. SEG, Tulsa, USA.
- Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2007. Curvature attribute applications to 3D surface seismic data. TheLeading Edge, 26: 404-414.
- Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2007. Volumetric curvature attributes add value to 3D seismic datainterpretation. The Leading Edge, 26: 856-867.102 CHEN, YANG, HE & ZHONG
- Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2008. Emerging and future trends in seismic attributes: The LeadingEdge, 27: 298-318.
- Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2009. Detecting stratigraphic features via crossplotting of seismicdiscontinuity attributes and their volume visualization. The Leading Edge, 28: 1422-1426.
- Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2010a. Integration of coherence and volumetric curvature images. TheLeading Edge, 29: 1092-1106.
- Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2010b. Delineating fractures from seismic attributes. Search andDiscovery Article #110124.
- Claerbout, J.F., 1976. Fundamentals of Geophysical Data Processing. McGraw-Hill Book Company,New York.
- Flierman, W., Weide, J.G., Wever, A., Brouwer, F. and Huck, A., 2008. Use of spatial, frequencyand curvature attributes for reservoir, fluid and contact predictions. Expanded Abstr., 78thAnn. Internat. SEG Mtg., Las Vegas: 1521-1525.
- French, W.S., 1974. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional migration of model-experimentreflection profiles. Geophysics, 39: 265-277.
- Gersztenkorn, A. and Marfurt, K.J., 1999. Eigenstructure-based coherence computations as an aidto 3-D structural and stratigraphic mapping. Geophysics, 64: 1468-1479.
- Hart, B.S., 2002. Validating seismic attributes: Beyond statistics. The Leading Edge, 21: 1016-1021.
- Klein, P., Richard, L. and James, H., 2008. 3D curvature attributes: a new approach for seismicinterpretation. First Break, 26: 105-112.
- Lisle, R.J., 1994. Detection of zones of abnormal strains in structures using Gaussian curvatureanalysis. AAPG Bull., 78: 1811-1819.
- Luo, Y., Higgs, W.G. and Kowalik, W.S., 1996. Edge detection and stratigraphic analysis using3D seismic data. Expanded Abstr., 66th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Denver: 324-327.
- Mai, H.T., Marfurt, K.J. and Chavez-Pérez, S., 2009. Coherence and volumetric curvatures andtheir spatial relationship to faults and folds, an example from Chicontepec basin, Mexico.
- Expanded Abstr., 79th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 1063-1067.
- Marfurt, K.J., Kirlin, R.L., Farmer, S. and Bahorich, M., 1998. 3-D seismic attributes using asemblance-based coherency algorithm. Geophysics, 63: 1150-1165.
- Marfurt, K.J., Sudhaker, V., Gersztenkorn, A., Crawford, K.D. and Nissen, S.E., 1999. Coherencycalculations in the presence of structural dip. Geophysics, 64: 104-111.
- Marfurt, K.J., 2006. Robust estimates of 3D reflector dip and azimuth. Geophysics, 71: P29-P40.
- Roberts, A., 2001. Curvature attributes and their application to 3D interpreted horizons. First Break,19: 85-100.