ARTICLE

Analysis of effective parameters for semblance-based coherency attributes to detect micro-faults and fractures

ALI HASHEMI GAZAR1 ABDOLRAHIM JAVAHERIAN2* HAMID SABETI3
Show Less
1 Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. alihashemi@ut.ac.ir,
2 Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.,
3 Birjand University of Technology, Birjand, Iran. hamid.sabeti@gmail.com,
JSE 2011, 20(1), 23–44;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Hashemi Gazar, A., Javaherian, A. and Sabeti, H., 2011. Analysis of effective parameters for semblance-based coherency attributes to detect micro-faults and fractures. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 20: 23-44. Coherency attributes are useful in the interpretation of seismic data and can be applied to 3D seismic data. When coherency attributes are applied to seismic data, they indicate the continuity between two or more traces within a seismic window. The rate of seismic continuity is an index of geological continuity. Areas of traces that change with faults or other geological phenomena have lower coherency in comparison with adjacent traces. Coherency attributes can be divided into three major groups: (1) cross-correlation, (2) eigenstructure and (3) semblance. In this paper, first, the ability of the three coherency attributes mentioned above to detect micro-faults was tested over 3D real data. The results proved that the semblance algorithm was much more powerful than the other algorithms in detecting micro-faults. Therefore, in the remainder of the study only the semblance attribute was employed. The effect of the dominant frequency, the signal-to-noise ratio, the dimensions of the analysis cube, and the apparent dip in the x- and in the y-directions on the semblance coherency attribute was investigated. The effects of these parameters were tested on 3D synthetic seismic data consisting of (1) horizontal layers, (2) dipping layers, and (3) cross-dipping layers. It is shown that for frequencies up to 20 Hz, there was no clear image of the micro-faults. However, for frequencies above 20 Hz, the resolution of micro-faults was increased. The results indicate that micro-faults are detectable with a signal-to-noise ratio of 1 or higher. When a signal-to-noise ratio of 0.5 is selected, micro-faults can still be detectable but with 0963-0651/11/$5.00 © 2011 Geophysical Press Ltd. 24 HASHEMI GAZAR, JAVAHERIAN & SABETI a lower resolution. According to synthetic models, a temporal window of 32 ms (k = 8) showed the best results for horizontal and dipping layers. The best size for the spatial window is 10x10 for horizontal and dipping layers. Therefore, the optimum cube dimensions of analysis are 10x10 x8. For these dimensions, the signal-to-noise ratio increases and micro-faults are clearly detectable. Regarding the cross-dipping model, apparent dip directions, p and q, were analyzed. The same optimum value of 10 ms/m was obtained for both. Real data which is related to carbonate units showed satisfactory results as well: micro-faults and minor fractures hidden in the primary data were detectable after applying the algorithm.

Keywords
coherency attributes
micro-faults
cross-correlation
eigenstructure
semblance
cross-dipping
3D seismic data
References
  1. Al-Dossary, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2006. Multispectral estimates of reflector curvature and rotation.
  2. Geophysics, 71: P41-P51.
  3. Bahorich, M.S. and Farmer, S.L., 1995. 3-D seismic discontinuity for faults and stratigraphic
  4. features; the coherence cube. The Leading Edge, 14: 1053-1058.
  5. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2005. Seismic attributes - A historical perspective. Geophysics, 70:
  6. 3SO-28SO.
  7. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2007a. Multispectral volumetric curvature adding value to 3D seismic
  8. data interpretation. Expanded Abstr., CSPG/CSEG Conv., Calgary.
  9. Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2007b. Volumetric curvature attributes for fault/fracture
  10. characterization. First Break, 25: 35-46.
  11. Golub, G.H. and Van Loan, C.F., 1989. Matrix Computations, 2nd Ed. The Johns Hopkins
  12. University, Baltimore.
  13. Gersztenkorn, A. and Marfurt, K.J., 1996a. Coherence computations with eigenstructure. Extended
  14. Abstr., 58th EAGE Conf., Amsterdam: X031.
  15. Gersztenkorn, A. and Marfurt, K.J., 1996b. Eigenstructure based coherence computations. Expanded
  16. Abstr., 66th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Denver: 328-331.
  17. Gresztenkorn, A. and Marfurt, K.J., 1999. Eigenstructure-based coherence computations as an aid
  18. to 3-D structural and stratigraphic mapping. Geophysics, 64: 1468-1479.
  19. Hart, B.S., Pearson, R. and Rawling, G.C., 2002. 3-D seismic horizon-based approaches to
  20. fracture-swarm sweet spot definition in tight-gas reservoirs. The Leading Edge, 21: 28-35.
  21. Javaheri Niestanak, A.R., Javaherian, A. and Amini, N., 2008. Fault detection using coherency
  22. attribute. Scientif. Quart. J. Geoscienc., 17: 48-59 (in Farsi with abstract in English).
  23. Marfurt, K.J., Kirlin, R.L., Farmer, S.L. and Bahorich, M.S., 1998. 3-D seismic attributes using
  24. a running window semblance-based algorithm. Geophysics, 63: 1150-1165.
  25. Masaferro, J.L., Bulnes, M., Poblet, J. and Casson, M., 2003. Kinematics evolution and fracture
  26. prediction of the Valle Morado structure inferred from 3-D seismic data, Salta Province,
  27. northwest Argentina. AAPG Bull., 87: 1083-1104.
  28. Roberts, A., 2001. Curvature attributes and their application to 3-D interpreted horizons. First
  29. Break, 19: 85-99.
  30. Rummerfeld, B., 1954. Reflection quality, a fourth dimension. Geophysics, 19: 684-694.
  31. Sigismondi, M. and Soldo, J.C., 2003. Curvature attributes and seismic interpretation: Case studies
  32. from Argentina basins. The Leading Edge, 22: 1122-1126.
  33. Taner, M.T., 2001. Seismic attributes. CSEG Recorder, 26: 49-55.
  34. Teleford, W.M., Geldrat, L.P., Sheriff, R.E. and Keys, D.A., 1976. Applied Geophysics.
  35. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing