ARTICLE

Reflected PP arrivals in anelastic media

P.F. DALEY E.S. KREBES L.R. LINES
Show Less
Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4,
JSE 2011, 20(1), 57–72;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Daley, P.F., Krebes, E.S. and Lines, L.R., 2011. Reflected PP arrivals in anelastic media. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 20: 57-72. A homogeneous wave incident on an interface between two anelastic halfspaces in welded contact is considered. In the anelastic sense, a homogeneous wave is defined by the condition that the propagation and attenuation vectors are colinear. It has been indicated in a number of papers over the past several decades that the proper definition of the real and imaginary parts of the vertical components of the slowness vector in the reflection coefficients are not obvious for some distributions of the quality factor, Q. This can result in anomalous behaviours of both or either of the amplitude and phase of the PP reflection coefficient when displayed versus the incident propagation angle or equivalently the real part of the horizontal component of the incident slowness vector. In an earlier work (Krebes and Daley, 2007) the question of anomalies in the amplitude and phase of the PP plane wave reflection coefficient for these distributions of the quality factor Q in adjacent anelastic halfspaces was discussed in considerable detail. In what follows, the above paper (Paper 1) will be referred to often to minimize repetition of previous discussions. The problem of the PP reflection coefficient is addressed again here. This is done within the context of two selected approximate methods, of varying complexity, which produce acceptable behaviour for the anomalous quantities, from a numerical viewpoint. What causes this behaviour in the PP reflection coefficient may be attributed, at least in part, to improper signs being imparted to the real and imaginary parts of the radical defining the transmitted P-wave vertical slowness vector component. However, this may be looked upon as a symptom rather than the actual cause of the problem. Consideration of the PP plane wave reflection coefficient is the first matter dealt with and the discussion is then extended to the high frequency geometrical optics solution of a Sommerfeld type integral, using zero order saddle point methods for determining the particle displacement vector of the reflected PP disturbance due to a P-wave point source incident at an interface separating two anelastic media. One approximation of the saddle point method was presented in detail in Paper 1 and another approximate approach was suggested and is expanded on here. The accuracies of approximations to the saddle point method are established through comparison with an 'exact' (numerical integration) solution.

Keywords
anelastic media
reflected PP arrivals
saddle point numerical integration
References
  1. Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A., 1980. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover, New York,
  2. NY.
  3. Azimi, S.A., Kalinin, A.V., Kalinin, V.V. and Pivovarov, B.L., 1968. Impulse and transient
  4. characteristics of media with linear and quadratic absorption laws. Izvestia Phys. Solid Earth,
  5. 2: 88-93.
  6. Aki, K. and Richards, P.G., 1980. Quantitative Seismology. W.H. Freeman and Company, San
  7. Francisco, CA.
  8. Aki, K. and Richards, P.G., 2002. Quantitative Seismology, 2nd Ed., University Science Books,
  9. 4 Saulsalito, CA.
  10. Cerveny, V. and Ravindra, R., 1971. Theory of Seismic Head Waves. University of Toronto Press,
  11. Toronto.
  12. Churchill, R.V. and Brown, J.W., 2003. Complex Variables and Applications. McGraw —Hill, New
  13. York, NY.
  14. Futterman, W.I., 1962. Dispersive body waves. J. Geophys. Res., 67: 5279-5291.
  15. Krebes, E.S. and Daley, P.F., 2007. Difficulties with computing anelastic plane wave reflection and
  16. transmission coefficients. Geophys. J. Internat., 16: 41—55.
  17. Marcuvitz, N. and Felsen, L.B., 1973. Radiation and Scattering of Waves. Prentice Hall, New
  18. Jersey.
  19. Rudd, B.O., 2005. Ambiguous reflection coefficients for anelastic media. Sixth Workshop Meeting
  20. on Seismic Waves in Laterally Inhomogeneous Media, Geophysical Institute, Academy of
  21. Sciences of the Czech Republic and Department of Geophysics, Charles University. (available
  22. online at http:/www.ig.cas.cz/activities/Posters/poster.php).
  23. Zahradnik, J., Jech, J. and Moczo, P., 2002. Approximate absorption corrections for complete SH
  24. seismograms. Studia Geophys. Geodaet., Special Issue 2002: 133-146.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing