ARTICLE

Sign-bit amplitude recovery in Gaussian noise

L.M. HOUSTON G.A. GLASS A.D. DYMNIKOV
Show Less
The University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504-4210, U.S.A.,
JSE 2010, 19(3), 249–262;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Houston, L.M., Glass, G.A. and Dymnikov, A.D., 2010. Sign-bit amplitude recovery in Gaussian noise. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 19: 249-262. Sign-bit amplitude recovery implies the recovery of signal from the average of the sign-bits of signal plus noise. We show that, given a Gaussian noise density, the average of the sign-bits of signal plus noise is not the signal, but is the Gauss error function with an argument that is proportional to the signal and inversely proportional to the standard deviation of the noise. This result can appear to provide amplitude recovery by producing a facsimile of the signal but the signal is only properly recovered by processing the data with the inverse error function. Based on the Central Limit Theorem, the optimal signal-to-noise ratio for amplitude recovery in Gaussian noise is identical to that of uniform noise, S/N = 1. This theory is tested using computer simulations with synthetic signal and noise. First, we demonstrate sign-bit amplitude recovery in uniform noise. Next, we compare the sign-bit average in uniform noise with the sign-bit average in Gaussian noise before and after the inverse error function is applied. Finally we compare hard clipping in uniform noise to soft clipping in Gaussian noise which occurs for large signal-to-noise ratios.

Keywords
sign-bit data
error function
probability density
Gaussian
variance
References
  1. Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (Eds.), 1972. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with
  2. Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Dover Publications, New York.
  3. Arfken, G., 1985. Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 3rd ed. Academic Press, Orlando.
  4. Carlitz, L., 1963. The inverse of the error function. Pacific J. Math., 13: 459-470.
  5. de Ridder, S. and Prieto, G.A., 2008. Seismic interferometry and spatial auto-correlation method
  6. on the regional coda of the non-proliferation experiment. Abstr., AGU Fall Mtg., San
  7. Francisco: $31A-1885.
  8. Gabel, R.A. and Roberts, R.A., 1987. Signals and Linear Systems, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons,
  9. New York.
  10. Houston, L.M. and Richard, B.A., 2004. The Helmholtz-Kirchoff 2.5D integral theorem for sign-bit
  11. data. J. Geophys. Engin., 1: 84-87.
  12. 262 HOUSTON, GLASS & DYMNIKOV
  13. Kahn, P.B., 1990. Mathematical Methods for Scientists & Engineers; Linear & Nonlinear Systems.
  14. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  15. O’Brien, J.T., Kamp, W.P. and Hoover, G.M., 1982. Sign-bit amplitude recovery with applications
  16. to seismic data. Geophysics, 47: 1527-1539.
  17. Papoulis, A., 1962. The Fourier Integral and its Applications. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.,
  18. New York.
  19. Papoulis, A., 1965. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. McGraw-Hill
  20. Kogakusha Ltd., Tokyo.
  21. Rice, J.A., 1995. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing