Pilot point parameterization in stochastic inversion for reservoir properties using time-lapse seismic and production data

Joint inversion of flow and seismic data for reservoir parameters is a challenging task in that these disparate datasets are sensitive to different physics and model resolutions for the forward problem. The inverse problem is highly non-linear introducing additional complexity. To overcome some of these challenges we have developed a global optimization method based on very fast simulated annealing (VFSA) and a pilot point based model parameterization scheme. Reservoir simulation is used to create the saturation and pressure distribution with time. The simulation results, are converted to seismic properties using an appropriate rock physics model. Seismic modeling is used to create the seismic response. The objective function is defined as a weighted sum of data misfit and prior model misfit and VFSA is used to derive optimal model parameters. Our results from synthetic examples reveal that the VFSA optimization scheme is robust and pilot point model parameterization is able to obtain reasonable descriptions of the reservoir. We further propose a probability based pilot point parameterization, where prior knowledge is used to compute the probability to draw the pilot points. In this way, the model parameters can be reduced further. To incorporate the small scale heterogeneity, we combine the pilot point based inversion method with sequential Gaussian simulation to create stochastic models.
- Bissell, R.C., Dubrule, O., Lamy, P. and Lepine, O., 1997. Combining geostatistical modeling with
- gradient information for history matching: the pilot point method. SPE 38730, San Antonio,
- Texas.
- Christie, M.A. and Blunt, M.J., 2001. Tenth SPE Comparative Solution Project: A Comparison of
- Upscaling Techniques. SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Feb. 11-14. SPE
- Deutsch, C.V. and Journel, A.G., 1998. GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and Users Guide,
- 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.
- Dong, Y.N., 2005. Integration of time-lapse seismic data into automatic history matching. Ph.D.
- dissertation, University of Tulsa, OK.
- Hoversten, M.G., Gritto, R., Washbourne, J. and Daley, T., 2003. Pressure and fluid saturation
- prediction in a multicomponent reservoir using combined seismic and electromagnetic
- imaging. Geophysics, 68: 1580-1591.
- Huang, X.R., 2001. Integrating time-lapse seismic with production data: A tool for reservoir
- engineering. TLE, 20: 1148-1153.
- Ingber, L., 1989. Very fast simulated reannealing. Math. Comput. Modeling, 12: 967-993.
- Ingber, L., 1993. Simulated annealing: practice versus theory. Math. Comput. Modell., 18: 29-57.
- Jacquard, P. and Jain, C., 1965. Permeability distribution from field pressure data. SPE Bull., 5:
- 281-194.
- 20 JIN, STOFFA, SEN, SEIF & SENA
- Jin, L., Sen, M.K., Stoffa, P.L. and Seif, R.K., 2007. Optimal model parameterization in stochastic
- inversion for reservoir properties using time-lapse seismic and production data. Expanded
- Abstr., 77th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., San Antonio: 1805-1809.
- de Marsily, G., Lavedan, G., Boucher, M. and Fasanino, G., 1984. Interpretation of interference
- tests in a well field using geostatistical techniques to fit the permeability distribution in a
- reservoir model. In: Verly et al. (Eds.), Geostatitics for Natural Resources Characterization,
- Part 2. D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht: 831-849.
- Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. and Dvorkin, J., 1998. The Rock Physics Handbook. Cambridge Univ.
- Press, Cambridge.
- Mohan, K. and Godofredo, P., 2002. Applied Geostatistics for Reservoir Characterization. SPE,
- Richardson, TX.
- Ramarao, B.S., Lavenue, A.M., de Marsily, G. and Marietta, M.G., 1995. Pilot point methodology
- for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated transmissivity fields:
- theory and computational experiments. Water Resource Res., 31: 475-493.
- Sahni, I. and Horne, R.N., 2006. Multiresolution reparameterization and partitioning of model space
- for reservoir characterization. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
- Sen, M.K. and Stoffa, P.L., 1991. Nonlinear one-dimensional seismic waveform inversion using
- simulated annealing. Geophysics, 56: 1624-1638.
- Sen, M.K. and Stoffa, P.L., 1992. Rapid sampling of model space using genetic algorithms:
- Examples from seismic waveform inversion. Geophys. J. Internat., 108: 281-292.
- Sen, M.K. and Stoffa, P.L., 1995. Global Optimization Methods in Geophysical Inversion. Elsevier
- Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
- Sen, M.K. and Stoffa, P.L., 1996. Bayesian inference, Gibb’s sampler and uncertainty estimation
- in geophysical inversion. Geophys. Prosp., 44: 313-350.
- Stephen, K.D. and MacBeth, C., 2006. Reducing reservoir prediction uncertainty using seismic
- history matching. SPE 100295.
- Stoffa, P.L. and Sen, M.K., 1992. Seismic waveform inversion using global optimization. J. Seismic
- Explor., 1: 9-27.
- Verly, G. and Oliver, D.S., 1994. Incorporation of transient pressure data into reservoir
- characterization. In Situ, 18: 243-274.