Enhanced amplitude variation with incident angle inversion with Cauchy regularization using ensemble smoother-based data assimilation
Amplitude variation with incident angle (AVA) inversion for partial angle stack seismic data is an extension of acoustic impedance inversion. It adopts the P-wave reflection coefficient to link seismic amplitude information with elastic parameters and incident angle. This method generalizes conventional acoustic impedance inversion to pre-stack seismic data, enabling the effective inversion of multiple elastic parameters by utilizing seismic data acquired at different incident angles, such as angle gather data or partial angle stack data. This study addresses the limitations of commonly used AVA inversion with Cauchy regularization. Due to the nonlinearity of Cauchy regularization, the iterative re-weighted least squares algorithm is extensively employed. It has been shown that the accuracy of inversion results of this non-linear inversion algorithm is highly dependent on the initial solution. When geological conditions are complex, the initial solution must be close to the optimal solution to ensure accurate inversion results. To address this challenge, this study proposes combining the ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation (ES-MDA) and AVA inversion with Cauchy sparse regularization. Specifically, the posterior mean of ES-MDA is used as the initial solution for AVA inversion with Cauchy sparse regularization. ES-MDA is a stochastic method that solves inverse problems by iteratively updating an ensemble of model realizations, yielding a solution that closely approximates the optimal solution. Practical application indicates that, compared with AVA inversion with Cauchy sparse regularization using a standard initial solution, the proposed method achieves improved accuracy in estimated elastic parameters. The research findings offer new technical approaches for seismic prediction with AVA inversion in complex reservoirs.
- Aki K, Richards PG. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods. Vols 1-2. San Francisco, CA: Freeman; 1980:160-195.
- Zoeppritz K, Erdbebenwellen VB. On the reflection and propagation of seismic waves. Gottinger Nachrichten. 1919;1:66-84.
- Shuey R. A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics. 1985;50(4):609-614. doi: 10.1190/1.1441936
- Russell BH, Gray D, Hampson DP. Linearized AVO and poroelasticity. Geophysics. 2011;76(3):C19-C29. doi: 10.1190/1.3555082
- Xiao S, Ba J, Guo Q, Carcione JM, Zhang L, Luo C. Seismic pre-stack AVA inversion scheme based on lithology constraints. J Geophys Eng. 2020;17(3):411-428. doi: 10.1093/jge/gxaa001
- Bao Y, Chen J, Liu XB, Zhao ZC. Joint PP and PS anisotropic AVO inversion using the exact Zoeppritz equations. J Seism Explor. 2021;30(6):529-544.
- Ye T, Li J, Ding W, Long F, Yang J, Liu C. Application of full-angle prestack density inversion for deep tidal-flat thin dolomite reservoirs. Geophys Prospect Pet. 2024;63(6):1203-1213. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.12431/issn.1000-1441.2024.63.06.011
- Zhou L, Li J, Chen X, Liu X, Chen L. Prestack amplitude versus angle inversion for Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio based on the exact Zoeppritz equations. Geophys Prospect. 2017;65(6):1462-1476. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.12493
- Li H. Prestack seismic prediction technique for ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs in Shunbei field. Geophys Prospect Pet. 2025;64(4):736-748. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.12431/issn.1000-1441.2025.0027
- Lehocki I, Mukerji T, Avseth P, Jensen EH. Algorithms for extraction of reliable density ratios from pre-stack seismic data—Part 1: Theory. Geophys Prospect. 2025;73(6):e70029. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.70029
- Sun W, Chen Z, Wang R, Duan M. Research on fluid identification technology of submarine fan reservoirs: A case study of Meishan Formation in Ledong–Lingshui Sag. Geophys Prospect Pet. 2025;64(6):1107-1117. [In Chinese]. doi: 10.12431/issn.1000-1441.2024.0230
- Zhang P, Xiao Y, Xiao P, Chen P, Xu W. A fluid factor inversion method using the frequency-domain two-step sub-band regularization. J Seism Explor. 2025;34(5):1-17. doi: 10.36922/JSE025310048
- Sacchi MD. Reweighting strategies in seismic deconvolution. Geophys J Int. 1997;129(3):651-656. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb04500.x
- Alemie W, Sacchi MD. High-resolution three-term AVO inversion by means of a Trivariate Cauchy probability distribution. Geophysics. 2011;76(3):R43-R55. doi: 10.1190/1.3554627
- Zhang F, Dai R. Nonlinear inversion of pre-stack seismic data using variable metric method. J Appl Geophys. 2016;129:111-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.03.035
- Dai R, Yin C. An iterative re-weighting algorithm for element to solve sparsity-regularized linear inverse problem and an application in sparse-spike deconvolution of seismic data. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2025;22:7506605. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2025.3574446
- Zhang R, Castagna J. Seismic sparse-layer reflectivity inversion using basis pursuit decomposition. Geophysics. 2011;76(6):R147-R158. doi: 10.1190/geo2011-0103.1
- Zong Z, Yin X, Wu G. Geofluid discrimination incorporating poroelasticity and seismic reflection inversion. Surv Geophys. 2015;36(5):659-681. doi: 10.1007/s10712-015-9330-6
- Wang Y. Basics of seismic inversion. In: Seismic Inversion: Theory and Applications. John Wiley & Sons; 2016:45-80. doi: 10.1002/9781119258032.ch1
- Emerick AA, Reynolds AC. Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation. Comput Geosci. 2013;55:3-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.011
- Gineste M, Eidsvik J. Seismic waveform inversion using the ensemble Kalman smoother. In: Proceedings of the 79th EAGE conference and exhibition 2017; June 12-15, 2017; Paris, France. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers; 2017:1-5. doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.201700794
- Grana D, Mukerji T, Doyen P. Seismic Reservoir Modeling: Theory, Examples, and Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons; 2021:130-145. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Seismic+Reservoir+Modeling%3A+Theory%2C+Examples%2C+and+Algorithms-p-9781119086185 [Last accessed in December 2025].
- Li C, Zhang F. Amplitude-versus-angle inversion based on the l1-norm-based likelihood function and the total variation regularization constraint. Geophysics. 2017;82(3):R173-R182. doi: 10.1190/geo2016-0182.1
- Dai R, Yang J. Amplitude-versus-angle (AVA) inversion for pre-stack seismic data with L0-Norm-Gradient regularization. Mathematics. 2023;11(4):880. doi: 10.3390/math11040880
- Fatti JL, Smith GC, Vail PJ, Strauss PJ, Levitt PR. Detection of gas in sandstone reservoirs using AVO analysis: A 3-D seismic case history using the Geostack technique. Geophysics. 1994;59(9):1362-1376. doi: 10.1190/1.1443695
