AccScience Publishing / JSE / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JSE026170074
ARTICLE

Rayleigh-wave dispersion curve inversion based on the mantis shrimp optimization algorithm

Zhongyi Duan1,2 Jiapan Yan1,2* Songhang Liu1,2 Fulong Zheng1,2
Show Less
1 Center for Geophysical Survey, China Geological Survey, Langfang, Hebei, China
2 Technology Innovation Center for Earth Near Surface Detection, China Geological Survey, Langfang, Hebei, China
Received: 24 April 2026 | Revised: 23 June 2026 | Accepted: 29 June 2026 | Published online: 22 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Rayleigh-wave dispersion curve inversion is an important technique for estimating subsurface shear-wave velocity structures; however, the inversion process is highly nonlinear due to the presence of multiple parameters and multiple extrema. Traditional local optimization algorithms are highly dependent on the initial model and prone to converging to local optima, whereas conventional global optimization algorithms often suffer from slow convergence and limited inversion accuracy. To address these limitations, this study introduces the mantis shrimp optimization algorithm (MShOA) for Rayleigh-wave dispersion curve inversion. The algorithm simulates the visual perception and behavioral strategies of mantis shrimp and employs a polarization-type indicator mechanism to balance global exploration and local exploitation during optimization. The performance of MShOA is evaluated against three theoretical geological models, including a velocity-increasing model, a low-velocity interlayer model, and a high-velocity interlayer model. Both noise-free and noisy dispersion curves contaminated with 10% random noise are considered. In addition, multi-order dispersion curve inversion experiments and measured microtremor data from the Wyoming region of the United States are used to further assess the proposed method’s applicability. The inversion results demonstrate that MShOA can accurately retrieve shear-wave velocity and layer thickness parameters across diverse geological conditions. For the noise-free models, the maximum relative error is 2.32%, while for the noisy models it is 1.64%. Comparative experiments indicate that MShOA achieves lower inversion errors and smaller parameter standard deviations than particle swarm optimization, dung beetle optimization, and mantis shrimp algorithm under the same search conditions. The results from both theoretical and measured data indicate that MShOA provides stable inversion performance and effectively handles complex Rayleigh-wave dispersion curve inversion problems. The proposed method offers a feasible approach for high-resolution shallow subsurface characterization and surface-wave inversion applications.

Keywords
Passive source surface-wave
Rayleigh-wave dispersion curve inversion
Noise resistance
Mantis shrimp optimization algorithm
Funding
This work has been supported by the Project of the China Geological Survey (Grant No. DD20243188).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.
References
  1. Rayleigh L. On waves propagated along the plane surface of an elastic solid. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1887;s1-17(1):4-11. doi: 10.1112/plms/s1-17.1.4
  2. Xia JH, Gao L, Pan Y, Shen C, Yin X. Gao pin mian bo fang fa de ruo gan xin jin zhan [New findings in high-frequency surface-wave method]. Chin. J. Geophys. 2015;58(8):2591-2605. [In Chinese] doi: 10.6038/cjg20150801
  3. Dorman J, Ewing M. Numerical inversion of seismic surface-wave dispersion data and crust-mantle structure in the New York-Pennsylvania area. J. Geophys. Res. 1962;67(13):5227-5241. doi: 10.1029/JZ067i013p05227
  4. Xia JH, Miller RD, Park CB, Hunter JA, Harris JB, Ivanov J. Comparing shear-wave velocity profiles inverted from multichannel surface-wave with borehole measurements. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2002;22(3):181-190. doi: 10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00008-8
  5. Ai D, Cheng Q. Di su ruan ruo jia ceng er wei heng bo su du jie gou de OCCAM fan yan [Estimation of 2D S-wave velocity section with low velocity layers by OCCAM algorithm]. Geotech. Investig. Surv. 2009;37(237):87-90. [In Chinese]
  6. Li C, Dosso SE, Dong HF. Gen ju fei xian xing bei ye si li lun de jie mian bo pin san qu xian fan yan [Interface-wave dispersion curves inversion based on nonlinear Bayesian theory]. Acta Acust. 2012;37(3):225-231. [In Chinese] doi: 10.15949/j.cnki.0371-0025.2012.03.018
  7. Wang Y, Song X, Zhang X. Ying yong ren gong shen jing wang luo suan fa de di zhen mian bo fei xian xing fan yan [Nonlinear inversion of seismic surface waves using an artificial neural network algorithm]. Oil Geophys. Prospect. 2021;56(5):979-991. [In Chinese] doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2021.05.005
  8. Chen X, Xia J, Pang J, Zhou C, Mi B. Deep learning inversion of Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves with geological constraints for near-surface investigations. Geophys. J. Int. 2022;231(1):1-14. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggac171
  9. Gan Y, Yang Z, Pan L, Sun YC, Zhang D, Gao Y, Chen X. Deep Learning-Based Dispersion Spectrum Inversion for Surface-wave Exploration. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2024;62(000):1-11. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3399033.
  10. Wang F, Song X, Li M. A deep-learning-based approach for seismic surface-wave dispersion inversion (SfNet) with application to the Chinese mainland. Earthq. Sci. 2023;36(2):147-168. doi: 10.1016/j.eqs.2023.02.007
  11. Chen XF, Tan XD, Shi YQ. Zhe she bo − Rui lei mian bo lian he fen xi fang fa zai QL3D gong qu biao ceng diao cha zhong de ying yong [Application of refracted wave and Rayleigh surface-wave joint analysis method in surface investigations of QL3D area]. Geophys. Prospect. Pet. 2025;64(5):826-834. [In Chinese] doi: 10.12431/issn.1000-1441.2024.0132
  12. Zhang Y, Lu L, Maupin V, Qin T, Ding Z. Mapping 3D Sedimentary Structures with Joint Inversion of H/V Spectral Ratios and Multimode Dispersion curves Derived from Ambient Noise—Application to the Xiong’an New Area, China. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2025;115(2):619-645. doi: 10.1785/0120240174.
  13. Shi Y, Jin W. Mian bo pin san fan yan di qiu nei bu gou zao de yi chuan suan fa [Genetic Algorithms Inversion of Lithospheric Structure from Surface-wave Dispersion]. Chin. J. Geophys. 1995;38(2):189-198. [In Chinese]
  14. Yamanaka H, Ishida H. Application of genetic algorithms to an inversion of surface-wave dispersion data. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 1996;86(2):436-444. doi: 10.1785/BSSA0860020436
  15. Dal Moro G., Pipan M., Gabrielli P. Rayleigh-wave dispersion curve inversion via genetic algorithms and marginal posterior probability density estimation. J. Appl. Geophys. 2007;61(1):39-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2006.04.002
  16. Martínez MD, Lana X, Olarte J, Badal J, Canas JA. Inversion of Rayleigh-wave phase and group velocities by simulated annealing. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2000;122(1-2):3-17. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9201(00)00183-7
  17. Beaty KS, Schmitt DR, Sacchi M. Simulated annealing inversion of multimode Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves for geological structure. Geophys. J. Int. 2002;151(2):622-631. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01809.x
  18. Cai W, Song XH, Yuan SC, Hu Y. Li yong li zi qun you hua suan fa kuai su, wen ding fan yan Rui lei bo pin san qu xian [Fast and stable Rayleigh-wave dispersion curve inversion based on particle swarm optimization]. Oil Geophys. Prospect. 2018;53(1):25-34+4-5. [In Chinese] doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2018.01.004
  19. Lei Y, Shen H, Li X, Wang X, Li Q. Inversion of Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves via adaptive GA and nested DLS. Geophys. J. Int. 2019;218(1):547-559. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggz171
  20. Sun X, Ji Z, Yang Q, Liu B. Ji yu gai jin ma que sou suo suan fa de Rui li bo pin san qu xian fan yan [Inversion of Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves based on the improved sparrow search algorithm]. Geophys. Geochem. Explor. 2022;46(5):1267-1275. [In Chinese] doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2022.1486
  21. Fu Y, Ai HB, Yao ZA, Mei ZX, Su KJ. Ji yu zheng yu xian suan fa de Rui li bo pin san qu xian fan yan [Inversion of the Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves based on the sine-cosine algorithm]. Geophys. Geochem. Explor. 2023;47(6):1467-1478. [In Chinese] doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2023.1239
  22. Fu Y, Ai HB, Yao ZA, Li HQ, Tian X, Zhang XM. Ying yong shan dian lian jie guo cheng you hua suan fa fan yan duo jie Rui lei bo pin san qu xian [Inversion of multi-mode Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves based on lightning attachment procedure optimization]. Oil Geophys. Prospect. 2023;58(4):830-838. [In Chinese] doi: 10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2023.04.008
  23. Liu S, Shen H, Che H, et al. Inversion of Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves integrating the Osprey–Cauchy and Pigeon-inspired optimization algorithm. Acta Geophys.2025;73(4):3195-3212. doi: 10.1007/s11600-025-01553-1
  24. Sánchez Cortez JA, Peraza Vázquez H, Peña Delgado AF. A Novel Bio-Inspired Optimization Algorithm Based on Mantis Shrimp Survival Tactics. Math. 2025;13(9):1500. doi: 10.3390/math13091500
  25. Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed R, Zidan M, Jameel M, Abouhawwash M. Mantis Search Algorithm: A novel bio-inspired algorithm for global optimization and engineering design problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2023;415:116200. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2023.116200
  26. Xia JH. Estimation of near-surface shear-wave velocities and quality factors using multichannel analysis of surface-wave methods. J. Appl. Geophys. 2014;103:140-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.01.016
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing