AccScience Publishing / JSE / Online First / DOI: 10.36922/JSE026270121
Cite this article
1
Download
60
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Source-independent elastic frequency-controllable envelope inversion

Qiu Du1 Zhaoqi Gao1*
Show Less
1 National Engineering Laboratory for Offshore Oil Exploration, School of Information and Communications Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi , China
Received: 1 July 2026 | Revised: 13 August 2026 | Accepted: 13 August 2026 | Published online: 14 September 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Elastic full-waveform inversion (EFWI) is a high-resolution inversion method that minimizes full-waveform misfit between synthetic and observed data under the seismic elastic wave equation. In practice, EFWI effectiveness depends strongly on the accuracy of the source wavelet and the initial models, as errors in either degrade the synthetic-observed match and drive the inversion toward local minima. To mitigate these issues, we develop a novel source-independent initial model building method for EFWI, termed source-independent elastic frequency-controllable envelope inversion (SIEFCEI), which enables accurate recovery of low-wavenumber P- and S-wave velocity models from multi-scale elastic frequency-envelope data without relying on an accurate source wavelet. The misfit function of SIEFCEI is formulated based on an amplitude-semblance function to eliminate the need for an accurate source wavelet during inversion, where the matching data in the misfit function are computed using the elastic frequency- controllable envelope operator. SIEFCEI exhibits two notable advantages. First, the data used in the inversion contain richer low-wavenumber information than conventional envelope data, owing to the frequency-controllable mechanism, which reduces the risk of convergence to local minima. Second, SIEFCEI avoids the need to select an optimized reference trace, as required by traditional source-independent approaches, which improves robustness under inconsistent source wavelets. Numerical tests on both synthetic and field data demonstrate the effectiveness of SIEFCEI when starting from poor initial models and using an inconsistent source wavelet.

Keywords
Elastic full-waveform inversion
Elastic frequency-controllable envelope
Source-independent inversion
Multi-scale inversion
Funding
The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42422404).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
  1. Tarantola A. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics. 1984;49(8):1259-1266. doi: 10.1190/1.1441754
  2. Virieux J, Operto S. An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics. 2009;74(6):WCC1-WCC26. doi:10.1190/1.3238367
  3. Hu Y, Huang X, Fu L, et al. Jiyu tan xing bo dong fang cheng de ju bu chi du zou shi fan yan [Elastic wave-equation based local-scale traveltime inversion]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics. 2024;67(10):3874–3890. [In Chinese] doi: 10.6038/cjg2023R0466
  4. Liang Z, Zheng Y, He C, Wu G, Zhang X, Gai Z. Elastic reflection traveltime inversion with pure-wave propagators. Geophysics. 2021;86(4):R639-R658. doi: 10.1190/geo2020-0733.1
  5. Wang G, Wang S, Song J, Dong C, Zhang M. Elastic reflection traveltime inversion with decoupled wave equation. Geophysics. 2018;83(5):R463-R474. doi: 10.1190/geo2017-0631.1
  6. Shin C, Ha W. Accumulated energy norm for full waveform inversion of marine data. J Appl Geophy. 2017;147:91-101. doi:1 0.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.10.005
  7. Hu Y, Wu RS, Han LG, Zhang P. Joint Multiscale Direct Envelope Inversion of Phase and Amplitude in the Time–Frequency Domain. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 2019;57(7):5108-5120. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2019.2896936
  8. Hu Y, Wu RS, Huang X, Long Y, Xu Y, Han LG. Phase-amplitude-based polarized direct envelope inversion in the time-frequency domain. Geophysics. 2022;87(3):R245-R260. doi: 10.1190/geo2020-0956.1
  9. Luo J, Wu RS. Initial model construction for elastic full waveform inversion using envelope inversion method. In: International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy. Vol 1. Society of Exploration Geophysicists; 2015:1420-1424. doi: 10.1190/segam2015-5820719.1
  10. Hu Y, Wu RS, Luo J, Chen G. A Review of Envelope Inversion for Large-Scale Background Model Building. Surv Geophys. 2025;46(6):1217-1246. doi: 10.1007/s10712-025-09913-8
  11. Guo Q, Alkhalifah T. Elastic reflection-based waveform inversion with a nonlinear approach. Geophysics. 2017;82(6):R309-R321. doi: 10.1190/geo2016-0407.1
  12. Sun H, Demanet L. Deep Learning for Low-Frequency Extrapolation of Multicomponent Data in Elastic FWI. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 2022;60:1-11. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2021.3135790
  13. Gao Z, Pan Z, Gao J, Wu RS. Frequency Controllable Envelope Operator and Its Application in Multiscale Full-Waveform Inversion. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 2019;57(2):683-699. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2018.2859219
  14. Du Q, Gao Z, Gao J. Elastic frequency controllable envelope inversion. J Geophys Eng. 2024;22(1):265-282. doi: 10.1093/jge/gxae122
  15. Du Q, Gao Z, Zhang W, Gao J. Structurally Consistent Elastic Frequency- Controllable Envelope Inversion for P- and S-Wave Velocity Model Building. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 2025;63:1-21. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2025.3631856
  16. Skopintseva LV, Maaø FA, Pedersen Ø. Importance of the Source Estimation in FWI - Sensitivity and Examples. In: Proceedings of the 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016. May 30, 2016-June 2, 2016; Vienna, Austria. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers; 2016:1-5. doi: 10.3997/2214-4609.201601015
  17. Fang Z, Wang H, Li M, Gu X, Li P. A Source-Independent TV-Regularized Full Waveform Inversion Method for Peripheral Imaging Around a Borehole. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 2024;62:1-9. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2024.3401034
  18. Choi Y, Alkhalifah T, DeVault B. Application of the unwrapped phase inversion to land data without source estimation. In: International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy. Vol 1. Society of Exploration Geophysicists; 2015:1225-1229. doi: 10.1190/segam2015-5873514.1
  19. Choi Y, Shin C, Min DJ, Ha T. Efficient calculation of the steepest descent direction for source-independent seismic waveform inversion: An amplitude approach. J Comput Phys. 2005;208(2):455-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.09.019
  20. Choi Y, Min DJ. Source-independent elastic waveform inversion using a logarithmic wavefield. J Appl Geophys. 2012;76:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.10.013
  21. Seo T, Shin C, Min D. Efficient calculation of steepest descent direction of source signature independent waveform inversion of logarithmic wavefield. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2004. Society of Exploration Geophysicists; 2004,23(1):1838-1841. doi: 10.1190/1.1845176
  22. Cheong S, Pyun S, Shin C. Two efficient steepest-descent algorithms for source signature-free waveform inversion. J Seism Explor. 2006;14(4):335–348.
  23. Choi Y, Alkhalifah T. Source-independent time-domain waveform inversion using convolved wavefields: Application to the encoded multisource waveform inversion. Geophysics. 2011;76(5):R125-R134. doi: 10.1190/geo2010-0210.1
  24. Zhang Q, Zhou H, Li Q, Chen H, Wang J. Robust source-independent elastic full-waveform inversion in the time domain. Geophysics. 2016;81(2):R29-R44. doi: 10.1190/geo2015-0073.1
  25. Ao R, Dong L, Chi B. Buyi lai zi boji yu bao luo de FWI chu shi mo xing jian li fang fa yan jiu [Source-independent envelope-based FWI to build an initial model]. Chin J Geophys. 2015;58(6):1998-2010. [In Chinese] doi: 10.6038/cjg20150615
  26. Zhang P, Wu RS, Han L. Source-independent seismic envelope inversion based on the direct envelope Fréchet derivative. Geophysics. 2018;83(6):R581-R595. doi: 10.1190/geo2017-0360.1
  27. Chi B, Huang L. Source-Independent Amplitude-Semblance Full-Waveform Inversion Using a Hybrid Time- and Frequency-Domain Approach. CiCP. 2020;28(1):328-341. doi: 10.4208/cicp.oa-2018-0199
  28. Wu RS, Luo J, Wu B. Seismic envelope inversion and modulation signal model. Geophysics. 2014;79(3):WA13-WA24. doi: 10.1190/geo2013-0294.1
  29. Bedrosian E. A product theorem for Hilbert transforms. Proc IEEE. 1963;51(5):868-869. doi: 10.1109/proc.1963.2308
  30. Brown JL. A Hilbert transform product theorem. Proc IEEE. 1986;74(3):520-521. doi: 10.1109/proc.1986.13495
  31. Zhang P, Han L, Zhang F, Feng Q, Chen X. Wavefield Decomposition-Based Direct Envelope Inversion and Structure-Guided Perturbation Decomposition for Salt Building. Minerals. 2021;11(9):919. doi: 10.3390/min11090919
  32. Sun J, Innanen K, Zhang T, Trad D. Implicit Seismic Full Waveform Inversion With Deep Neural Representation. JGR Solid Earth. 2023;128(3). doi: 10.1029/2022jb025964
  33. Zhao P, Fang J, Jie C, Zhang J, Wang E, Zhang S. Multiscale Deep Learning Reparameterized Full Waveform Inversion With the Adjoint Method. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sensing. 2025;63:1-12. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2025.3553053
  34. Zhu W, Xu K, Darve E, Biondi B, Beroza GC. Integrating deep neural networks with full-waveform inversion: Reparameterization, regularization, and uncertainty quantification. Geophysics. 2021;87(1):R93-R109. doi: 10.1190/geo2020-0933.1
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing