Spectral decomposition and AVO-based amplitude decomposition: a comparative study and application

Farfour, M., Yoon, W.J., Gaci, S. and Ouabed, N., 2020. Spectral decomposition and AVO-based Amplitude Decomposition: a comparative study and application. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 29: 261-273. Seismic data are very rich in information about rocks and fluids saturating their pores. As a result of their unique mineralogical compositions and fluid properties that discriminate them from their surroundings, hydrocarbon-saturated formations have proved to have their own characteristic frequencies at which they preferentially show up in seismic data. This has provided considerable support to interpretations of spectral decomposition methods and led to great success in detecting hydrocarbons in many basins of the world. Early works in Amplitude Variation with Offset (AVO) proved that geological formations containing hydrocarbons have also their own amplitude expressions with which they respond to seismic excitations. These seismic responses are controlled by their lithology type, pore space, and fluid content. This in turn has supported interpretations of strong amplitude anomalies observed at top of hydrocarbon- saturated reservoirs and led to the success of AVO in many areas around the globe. In this study, AVO-based amplitude decomposition is introduced as a new way to look at seismic amplitudes from AVO. The amplitude decomposition is compared with the decomposition of frequencies concept and methods. Both decompositions are examined over a gas-saturated sandstone from Alberta, Canada. Results demonstrated that decomposing both amplitude and frequency of seismic data into their constituent components can help detect more reliable expressions from fluid-saturated formations. The study shows that the Intercept and Gradient can be used to reproduce partial stacks and also gathers and suggests that the two attributes can be thought of as alternative products to partial stacks.
- Aki, K. and Richards, P.G., 1980. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods. W.H.Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA.
- Castagna, J.P., Sun, S. and Siegfried, R.W., 2003. Instantaneous spectral analysis:
- Detection of low-frequency shadows associated with hydrocarbons. The LeadingEdge, 22: 120-127.
- Chakraborty, A. and Okaya, D., 1995. Frequency-time decomposition of seismic datausing wavelet-based methods. Geophysics, 60: 1906-1910.
- Chen, G., Matteucci, G., Fahmi, B. and Finn, Ch., 2008. Spectral-decomposition responseto reservoir fluids from a deepwater West Africa reservoir. Geophysics 73, C2-C30.
- Chopra, S. and Marfurt, K.J., 2007. Seismic Attributes for Prospect Identification andReservoir Characterization. SEG, Tulsa, OK.
- Downton, J.E., Russell, B-H. and Lines, L.R. 2000. AVO for managers: pitfalls andsolutions. CREWES Research Report, 12.
- Farfour, M., Yoon, W.J. and Jang, S., 2016. Energy-weighted Amplitude Variation with
- Offset: an AVO attribute for low impedance gas sands. J. Appl. Geophys., 123(6):167-177
- Farfour, M. and Gaci, S., 2018. Spectral decomposition and amplitude decomposition todetect hydrocarbons: comparison and application. RDPETRO 2018: Res.
- Develop. Petrol. Conf., Abu Dhabi, UAE, May 2018: 144-147.
- Farfour, M., Yoon, W.J. and Kim, J. 2015. Seismic attributes and acoustic impedanceinversion in interpretation of complex hydrocarbon reservoirs. J. Appl. Geophys.,111: 66-75.
- Han, J. and van der Baan, M., 2013. Empirical mode decomposition for seismic time-frequency analysis. Geophysics, 78(2): O9-O19.
- Hendrickson, J., 1999. Stacked. Geophys. Prosp., 47: 663-705.
- Huang, N.E., Shen, Z., Long, S.R., Wu, M.C., Shih, H.H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N.-C., Tung,
- C.C. and Liu, H.H., 1998. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbertspectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. Roy. Soc.
- London, Series A: Mathemat., Phys. Engineer. Sci., 454: 903-995.
- Li, Y., Downton, J. and Xu, Y., 2007. Practical aspects of AVO modeling. The LeadingEdge,
- Loizou, N. and Chen, S., 2012. The application and value of AVO and spectraldecomposition for derisking Palaeogene prospects in the UK North Sea. First Break,30: 55-67.
- Ostrander, W.J., 1984. Plane-wave reflection coefficients for gas sands at non-normalangles of incidence. Geophysics, 49: 1637-1648.
- Rutherford, S.R. and Williams, R.H., 1989. Amplitude-versus-offset variations in gassands. Geophysics, 54: 680-688
- Shuey, R.T., 1985. A simplification of the Zoeppritz equations. Geophysics, 50: 609-614.
- Sinha, S., Routh, P., Anno, P. and Castagna, J.P., 2005. Spectral decomposition ofseismic data with continuous-wavelet transform. Geophysics, 70(6): P19-P25.
- Stockwell, R.G., Mansinha, L. and Lowe, R.P., 1996. Localization of the complexspectrum: the S transform. IEEE Transact. Signal Process., 44: 998-1001.
- Tai, S., Puryear, P. and Castagna, J.P., 2009. Local frequency as a direct hydrocarbonindicator. Expanded Abstr., 79th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 2160-2164.
- Torres, M.E., Colominas, M.A., Schlotthauer, G. and Flandrin, P., 2011. A completeensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. IEEE Internat. Conf.
- Acoust., Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP): 41444147
- Wiggins, R., Kenny, G.S. and McClure, C.D., 1983. A method for determining anddisplaying the shear-velocity refiectivities of a geologic formation. European PatentApplicat. 0113944.
- Wu, Z. and Huang, N.E., 2009. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A noise-assisted data analysis method. Advan. Adapt. Data Analys., 1: 141.
- Yoon, W.J. and Farfour, M., 2012. Spectral decomposition aids AVO analysis inreservoir characterization: a case study of Blackfoot field, AB, Canada. J. ComputersGeosci., 46: 60-65.
- Zoeppritz, K., 1919. Erdbebenwellen VIIIB, On the reflection and propagation of seismicwaves. GOttinger Nachrichten, I, 66-84.