ARTICLE

Seismic imaging offshore Pohang using small-boat ultra-high-resolution 3D seismic survey

JUNGKYUN SHIN1 HYUNDO KIM2 WONSIK KIM1 DONGHYO KANG1 CHANSU KIM2 CHANHO PARK3 JOOBONG JEONG4
Show Less
1 Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, 905, Yeongilman-daero, Heunghae-eup, Buk-gu, Pohang, Gyeongsangbuk-do, 37559, South Korea.,
2 Geoview Co. Ltd., 423, Hasinbeonyeong-ro, Saha-gu, Busan, 49301, South Korea.,
3 Sherpa Engineering and Construction Inc., South Korea.,
4 Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, South Korea.,
JSE 2020, 29(2), 125–138;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Shin, J.K., Kim, H.D., Kim, W., Kang, D.H., Kim, C.S., Park, C.H. and Jeong, J.B., 2020. Seismic imaging offshore Pohang using small-boat ultra-high-resolution 3D seismic survey. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 29: 125-138. A joint study by the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) and Geoview Co. Ltd. has developed a new 3D ultra-high-resolution (UHR) seismic survey system called the Engineering Ocean Seismic 3D-Streamer (EOS3D- Streamer). The EOS3D-Streamer is a receiver system comprising two, 8-channel 93 meter streamers that are used in conjunction with a small air gun system as a seismic source. To verify the new system, a test survey was performed over two years in 2016 and 2017 in Pohang City’s Yeongil Bay located offshore the southeastern part of Korea. In the test survey, 139 lines of seismic data were acquired in a survey region of 1,400 m x 500 m. A basic seismic data processing algorithm was applied to the data that was divided by channel. Subsequently, a 3D seismic cube was produced for each channel using a radial basis function (RBF) interpolation method in a stage of 3D flexi-binning. A final 3D cube with an improved signal to noise ratio was produced after normal move-out correction using a 1D velocity model and multi-channel stacking. Finally, a shallow fault and gas analysis was performed through a data interpretation process. Through this study, we confirmed that it is possible to perform economical UHR 3D surveys using general-purpose small vessels in coastal areas where it is difficult for large seismic vessels to enter and perform surveys.

Keywords
ultra-high-resolution
seismic survey
3D
small-boat
EOS3D project.
References
  1. Fornberg, B. and Flyer, N., 2005. Accuracy of radial basis function interpolation and
  2. derivative approximations on 1-D infinite grids. Adv. Comput. Math., 23: 5-20.
  3. Hale, D., 2009. Image-guided blended neighbor interpolation, CWP Report 634.
  4. Henriet, J.P., Verschuren, M. and Versteeg, W., 1992. Very high-resolution 3D seismic
  5. reflection imaging of small-scale structural deformation. First Break, 10: 81-88.
  6. Lee, H.-Y., Hyun, B.-K. and Kong, Y.-S., 1996. PC-based acquisition and processing of
  7. high-resolution marine seismic data. Geophysics, 61: 1804-1812.
  8. Lee, H., Park, K., Koo, N., Yoo, D., Kang, D., Kim, Y., Hwang, K. and Kim, J., 2004.
  9. High-resolution shallow marine seismic surveys off Busan and Pohang , Korea ,
  10. using a-small-scale multichannel system. J. Appl. Geophys., 56: 1-15.
  11. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2004.03.003
  12. Lee, H., Shinn, Y.J., Ong, S.H., Woo, S.W., Park, K.G., Lee, T.J. and Moon, S.W., 2017.
  13. Fault reactivation potential of an offshore CO2 storage site, Pohang Basin, South
  14. Korea. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 152, 427-442. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2017.03.014
  15. Lericolais, G., Allenou, J.P., Berne, S. and Morvan, P., 1990. A new system for
  16. acquisition and processing of very high-resolution seismic reflection data.
  17. Geophysics, 55: 1036-1046.
  18. Marsset, B., Blarez, E. and Girault, R., 1994. Very high-resolution multichannel r
  19. ecording for shallow seismic. Offshore Technol. Conf., Houston: 15-20.
  20. doi:https://doi.org/10.4043/7371-MS
  21. Marsset, B., Missiaen, T., Roeck, D., Noble, M., Versteeg, W. and Henriet, J.P., 1998.
  22. Very high-resolution 3D marine seismic data processing for geotechnical
  23. applications. Geophys. Prosp., 46: 105-120.
  24. McGee, T.M., 1995. High-resolution marine reflection profiling for engineering and
  25. environmental purposes. Part B: Digitizing analogue seismic signals. J. Appl.
  26. Geophys., 33: 287-296.
  27. Missiaen, T., 2005. VHR marine 3D seismics for shallow water investigations: Some
  28. practical guidelines. Mar. Geophys. Res. 26,: 145-155.
  29. Mjelde, R., 2006. 3D Seismic [WWW Document]. Univ. i Oslo.
  30. http://folk.uio.no/hanakrem/svalex/E-learning/geophysics/3D-Seismic.swf
  31. Mosher, D.C. and Simpkin, P.G., 1999. Status and trends of marine high-resolution
  32. seismic reflection profiling: Data acquisition. Geosci. Canada, 26: 174-188.
  33. doi: 10.12789/gs.v2614.4024
  34. Miiller, C., Milkereit, B., Bohlen, T. and Theilen, F., 2002. Towards high-resolution 3D
  35. marine seismic surveying using Boomer sources. Geophys. Prosp., 50: 517-526.
  36. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2002.00335.x
  37. Miiller, C., Woelz, S., Ersoy, Y., Boyce, J., Jokisch, T., Wendt, G. and Rabbel, W., 2009.
  38. Ultra-high-resolution marine 2D-3D seismic investigation of the Liman
  39. Tepe/Karantina Island archaeological site (Urla/Turkey). J. Appl. Geophys., 68:
  40. 124-134. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.10.015
  41. Nissen, S.E., Combes, J.M. and Nekut, A.G., 1999. Acquisition, processing, and analysis
  42. of shallow, high-resolution seismic data from the outer continental shelf and
  43. upper slope, offshore Louisiana. J. Sediment. Res. 69, 300-316.
  44. Park, S., Xie, L., Kim, K.-I., Kwon, S., Min, K.-B., Choi, J., Yoon, W.-S. and Song, Y.,
  45. First hydraulic stimulation in fractured geothermal reservoir in Pohang
  46. PX-2 well. Procedia Engineer., 191: 829-837.
  47. Pugin, A., Pullan, S.E., Burns, R.A., Douma, M. and Good, R.L., 1999. High-resolution,
  48. multichannel, marine seismic surveying using a small airgun source. Symp. on
  49. Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems.
  50. Oakland: 255-264.
  51. Reynolds, J.M., 1990. High-resolution seismic reflection surveying of shallow marine
  52. and estuarine environments. In: Hailwood, E.A. and Kidd, R. (Eds.), Marine
  53. Geological Surveying and Sampling. Springer Verlag, Berlin: 41-48.
  54. Scheidhauer, M., Marillier, F. and Dupuy, D., 2005. Development of a system for 3D
  55. high-resolution seismic reflection profiling on lakes. Mar. Geophys. Res., 26:
  56. 183-195. doi:10.1007/s11001-005-3717-6
  57. Yilmaz, O., 1987. Seismic Data Analysis. SEG, Tulsa, OK.
  58. Zhang, M. and Liu, Y., 2017. Seismic data interpolation based on radial basis function.
  59. Abstr., Internat. Geophys. Conf., Qingdao, China: 435-439.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing