Design and application of a Mini-SOSIE system
Chen, Z., Li, N., Zhu, Y., Zhang, Y, Long, Y., Wen, X. and Sun, F., 2017. Design and application of a Mini-SOSIE system. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 26: 521-539. The main objectives of this study were to (1) design and develop a Mini-SOSIE system, and (2) assess its performance at a test site. Mini-SOSIE is a light, portable, and nondestructive vibrator that is useful for shallow seismic exploration. During normal operation, the frequency of the vibrator is relatively periodic, leading the autocorrelation to have multiple peaks that affect the correlated shot record; i.e., there is strong interference and thus low resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). However, randomly varying the throttle using a control system can overcome the periodic nature of the vibrations. To achieve such control, we designed the system and its electronic controller, introducing a pseudo-random control scheme to the Mini-SOSIE system. Field tests verified the validity and efficacy of the designed system. The autocorrelation of the reference trace was better; its SNR was improved by 16.3 dB with respect to normal operation. The new Mini-SOSIE system design provides an alternative for shallow seismic exploration and small engineering exploration. It is also a stable reliable source that can emit a stable repeatable source waveform, which can provide high- quality field data and improve the performance of seismic exploration in the first step.
- Barbier, M.G., Bondon, P., Mellinger, R. and Viallix, J.R., 1976. Mini-Sosie for landseismology. Geophys. Prosp., 24: 518-527.
- Barbier, M.G., 1983. The Mini-SOSIE method. Internat. Human Resour. Develop. Corp.,Boston: 96 pp.
- Becquey, M., 2002. Pseudo-random coded simultaneous vibroseismics. Expanded Abstr.,2nd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Salt Lake City.
- Chang, X. and Liu, Y.K., 2010. Seismic profile of the Huangzhuang-Gaoliying fault in
- Beijing by Mini-SOSIE method. Expanded Abstr., 70th Ann. Intenat. SEG Mtg.Calgary, AB, 29: 1970-1974.
- Cunningham, A.B., 1979. Some alternate vibrator signals. Geophysics, 44: 1901-1921.
- Dean, T., 2012. Establishing the limits of vibrator performance - Experiments with
- Pseudorandom Sweeps. Expanded Abstr., 82nd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., LasVegas.
- Dean, T., 2014. The use of pseudorandom sweeps for vibroseis surveys. Geophys. Prosp.,62: 50-74.
- Driml, K., Reveleigh, M. and Bartlett, K., 2001. Mini-SOSIE-successful shallow 3Dseismic data acquisition in an environmentally sensitive area. Extended Abstr.,11th ASEG Mtg., Brisbane, Aug 1 一 4.
- Feroci, M., Balia, R., Bosman, C., Cardarelli, E., Deidda, G. and Orlando, L., 2000.
- Some considerations on shallow seismic reflection surveys. J. Appl. Geophys., 45:127-139.
- Giustiniani, M., Accaino, F., Picotti, S. and Tinivella, U., 2008. Characterization of theshallow aquifers by high-resolution seismic data. Geophys. Prosp., 56: 655-666.
- Maxwell, P., Gibson, J., Egreteau, A., Forest, L., Baeten, G. and Sallas, J., 2010.
- Extending low frequency bandwidth using Pseudorandom Sweeps. Expanded Abstr.,80th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Denver, 29: 101-105.
- Nasreddin, H., Dean, T. and Iranpour, K., 2012. The use of Pseudorandom Sweeps toreduce interference noise in simultaneous vibrosies surveys. Extended Abstr., 22ndInternat. ASEG Mtg., Brisbane.
- Peinado, A. and Subater Fuster, A., 2013. Generation of Pseudorandom binarysequences by means of Linear Feedback Shift Register (LFSRs) with dynamicfeedback. Math. Comput. Model., 57: 2596-2604.
- Pratt, T.L., Shaw, J.H. and Dolan, J.F., 2002. Shallow seismic imaging of folds above the
- Puente Hills blind-thrust fault, Los Angeles, California. Geophys. Res. Lett., 9(29):
- Sallas, J.J., Gibson, J.B., Lin, F., Winter, O., Montgomery, B. and Nagarajappa, P.,
- Broadband vibroseis using simultaneous Pseudorandom Sweeps. Expanded
- Abstr., 78th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg, Las Vegas, 27(1): 100-103.
- Sallas, J.J., Gibson, J. Maxwell, P. and Lin, F., 2011. Pseudorandom Sweeps forsimultaneous sourcing and low-frequency generation. The Leading Edge. 30: 1162-
- Sarwate. D.V. and Pursley, M.B., 1980. Crosscorrelation properties of pseudorandomand related sequences. Proc. IEEE, 68: 1554.
- Sexton, J.L., Henson, H.,Jr., Dial, P. and Shedlock, K., 1992. Mini-Sosie high-resolutionseismic reflection profiles along the Bootheel Lineament in the New Madrid seismiczone. Seismol. Res. Lett., 67: 297-307.
- Sexton, J.L. and Jones, P.B., 1988. Mini-SOSIE high-resolution reflection survey of — the
- Cottonwood Grove Fault in Northwestern Tennessee. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 78:838-854.
- Shtivelman, V., 2001. Shallow water seismic surveys for site investigation in the Haifaport extension area, Israel. J. Appl. Geophys., 46: 143-158.
- Stasev, Y.V., Kuznetsov, A.A. and Nosik, A.M., 2007. Formation of Pseudorandomsequences with improved autocorrelation properties. Cybernet. Sys. Anal., 43: 1- 11.
- Strong, S.R., 2003. Numerical Modeling of Pseudorandom Seismic Sources. HonorsThesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane.
- Strong, S.R. and Hearn, S., 2004. Numerical modeling of pseudo-random land seismicsources. Extended Abstr., 14th ASEG Mtg., Melbourne: 1-4.
- Wang, C.Y., 2002. Detection of a recent earthquake fault by the shallow reflectionseismic method. Geophysics, 67: 1465-1473.
- Yordkayhun, S., Ivanova, A., Giese, R., Juhlin, C. and Cosma, C., 2009. Comparison ofsurface seismic sources at the CO2SINK site, Ketzin, Germany. Geophys. Prosp., 57:125-139.
