Cite this article
1
Download
44
Views
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Plane-wave least-square reverse time migration with encoding strategies

CHUANG LI1 JIANPING HUANG1,3 ZHENCHUN LI1 RONGRONG WANG2
Show Less
1 Department of Geophysics, School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, P.R. China. jphuang@mail.ustc.edu.cn,
2 College of Information and Control Engineering, China university of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, P.R.China.,
3 Earth Science Department, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, U.S.A.,
JSE 2016, 25(2), 177–197;
Submitted: 16 January 2015 | Accepted: 15 January 2016 | Published: 1 April 2016
© 2016 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Li, C., Huang, J., Li, Z. and Wang, R., 2016. Plane-wave least-square reverse time migration with encoding strategies. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 25: 177-197. Plane-wave Least-Squares Reverse Time Migration (PLSRTM) delivers high resolution images with less computational cost compared with conventional Least-Squares Reverse Time Migration (LSRTM). But a great number of computational cost is still necessary to suppress migration artefacts. The study of plane-wave encoding strategy with better migration artefacts reduction may help to further improve the computational efficiency. In this paper, we present the theory and work flow of PLSRTM method; furthermore four different encoding strategies are applied to PLSRTM including static encoding, dynamic encoding, hybrid encoding and random dynamic encoding. Additionally, the illumination preconditioner and the mixed optimization method are introduced to accelerate the convergence rate. The numerical tests are implemented both on the synthetic data of Marmousi model and the 2D field data to compare the image quality and the computational cost of different encoding strategies. The results suggest that the static encoding method has a best imaging quality but highest computational cost while the improved encoding strategies have better computational efficiency which is suitable for the processing of mass data. Among them, PLSRTM with hybrid encoding has the advantage of less I/O cost and PLSRTM with random dynamic encoding shows better imaging quality and convergence with less iteration.

Keywords
least-square migration
plane-wave encoding
encoding strategy
randomized sampling
References
  1. Baysal, E., Kosloff, D.D. and Sherwood, J.W.C., 1983. Reverse time migration. Geophysics, 48:1514-1524.
  2. Beydoun, W.B. and Mendes, M., 1989. Elastic ray-born 12-migration/inversion. Geophys. J.Internat., 97: 151-160.
  3. Berkhout, A.J., 1992. Areal shot record technology. J. Seismic Explor., 1: 251-264.
  4. Claerbout, J.F., 1992. Earth Soundings Analysis: Processing Versus Inversion. Blackwell ScientificPublications, Oxford.
  5. Chen, K.J., 1985. Optimization Computing Methods. Xidian University Press, Xi’an (in Chinese).
  6. Chen, S.C. and Cao, J.Z., 2002. Plane-wave migration. Progr. Explor. Geophys., 25(3): 37-41 (inChinese).
  7. Dai., W., Wang, X. and Schuster, G.T., 2011. Least-squares migration of multisource data witha deblurring filter. Geophysics, 76(5): R135-R146.
  8. Dai, W., Fowler, P. and Schuster, G.T., 2012. Multi-source least-squares reverse time migration.Geophys. Prosp., 60: 681-695.
  9. Dai, W. and Schuster, G.T., 2013. Plane-wave least-squares reverse-time migration. Geophysics,78(4): 5165-5177.
  10. Huang, J.P., Cao, X.L., Li, Z.C., Sun, Y.S., Li, C. and Gao, G.C., 2014. Application ofleast-square reverse time migration in the high resolution imaging of near-surface. OilGeophys. Prosp., 49: 112 (in Chinese).
  11. Jin, S., Madariaga, R., Virieux, J. and Lambaré, G., 1992. Two-dimensional asymptotic iterativeelastic inversion. Geophys. J. Internat., 108: 575-588.
  12. Lambaré, G., Virieux, J., Madariaga, R. and Jin, S., 1992. Iterative asymptotic inversion of seismicprofiles in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 57: 1138-1154.
  13. Li, C., Huang, J.P. and Li, Z.C., 2014a. Application of plane-wave least square migration in faultblock reservoirs: a case study. Extended Abstr., 76th EAGE Conf., Amsterdam.
  14. Li. C., Huang, J.P., Li, Z.C. and Li, Q.Y., 2014b. Plane-wave least square reverse time migrationfor rugged topography. Expanded Abstr., 84th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Denver:3742-3746.
  15. Liu, F., Stolt, R.H., Hanson, D.W. and Day, R.S., 2002. Plane wave source composition: anaccurate phase encoding scheme for prestack migration. Expanded Abstr., 72nd Ann.Internat. SEG Mtg., Salt Lake City.
  16. Luo, Y. and Schuster, G.T., 1991. Wave-equation traveltime inversion. Geophysics, 56: 645-653.
  17. Mosher, C.C., Foster, D.J. and Hassanzadeh, S., 1997. Common angle imaging with offset planewaves. Expanded Abstr., 67th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Dallas: 1379-1382.
  18. Nemeth, T., Wu, C. and Schuster, G.T., 1999. Least-squares migration of incomplete reflectiondata. Geophysics, 64: 208-221.
  19. Schuster, G.T., Wang, X., Huang, Y., Dai, W. and Boonyasiriwat, C., 2011. Theory ofmultisource crosstalk reduction by phase-encoded statics. Geophys. J. Internat., 184:1289-1303.
  20. Tarantola, A., 1984. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics,49: 1259-1266.
  21. Tarantola, A., 1987. Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter
  22. Estimation. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
  23. Wang, X., Huang, Y., Dai, W. and Schuster, G.T., 2014. 3D Plane-wave least-squares
  24. Kirchhoff migration. Expanded Abstr., 84th Ann. Internat SEG Mtg., Denver.
  25. Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Notfors, C., Gray, S.H., Chernis, L. and Young, J., 2005. Delayed-shot 3Ddepth migration. Geophysics, 70(5): E21-E28.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing