ARTICLE

A fast method for generating high-resolution single-frequency seismic attributes

MOHAMMAD RADAD ALI GHOLAMI HAMID REZA SIAHKOОHI
Show Less
Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Iran.,
JSE 2016, 25(1), 11–25;
Submitted: 23 April 2015 | Accepted: 22 October 2015 | Published: 1 February 2016
© 2016 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Radad, M., Gholami, A. and Siahkoohi, H.R., 2016. A fast method for generating high-resolution single-frequency seismic attributes. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 25: 11-25. Single-frequency seismic attributes play an important role in seismic data interpretation. The resolution of single-frequency seismic sections and the run time for generating them are two main factors which need significant attention when dealing with large seismic data sets. In this paper, using the Fourier domain formulation of time-frequency analysis, we formulate the problem of extracting a single-frequency section from time-frequency representation of the data, without requiring the analysis of all frequencies. Furthermore, using an optimization algorithm based on maximum energy concentration, a method is proposed for automatic adjustment of the width of window required for extracting local information around the desired frequency. Application on 2D and 3D seismic data sets for detecting low-frequency shadow of gas-bearing zones and channel detection confirmed the high performance of the proposed method and its efficiency compared to conventional time-frequency based techniques like standard S-transform.

Keywords
single-frequency
energy concentration
seismic attribute
gas and channel detection
References
  1. Barnes, A.E., 1992. Another look at NMO stretch. Geophysics, 57: 749-751.
  2. Castagna, J.P., Sun, S. and Seigfried, R.W., 2003. Instantaneous spectral analysis: detection oflow-frequency shadows associated with hydrocarbons. The Leading Edge, 22: 120-127.
  3. Chuang, H. and Lawton, D.C., 1995. Frequency characteristics of seismic reflections from thinbeds. Can. J. Explor. Geophys., 31: 32-37.
  4. Deng, J., Han, D., Liu, J. and Yao, Q., 2007. Application of spectral decomposition to detectdeepwater gas reservoir. Expanded Abstr., 77th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., San Antonio.
  5. Dilay, A. and Eastwood, J. 1995. Spectral analysis applied to seismic monitoring of thermalrecovery. The Leading Edge, 14: 1117-1222.
  6. Djurovic, I., Sejdic, E. and Jiang, J. 2008. Frequency-based window width optimization for
  7. S-transform. Int. J. Electron. Comm., 62: 245-250.
  8. Ebrom, D., 2004. The low-frequency gas shadow on seismic sections. The Leading Edge, 23: 772.
  9. Gholami, A., 2013. Sparse time-frequency decomposition and some applications. IEEE Transact.Geosci. Remote Sens., 51: 3598-3604.
  10. Herrera, R.H., Han, J. and van der Baan, M., 2014. Applications of the synchrosqueezing transformin seismic time-frequency analysis. Geophysics, 79(3): V55-V64.
  11. Hurley, N. and Rickard, $., 2009. Comparing measures of sparsity; Information Theory. [EEETransact., 55: 4723-4741.
  12. Jones, D. and Parks, T., 1990. A high resolution data-adaptive time-frequency representation. [EEE
  13. Transact. Acoust. Speech Signal Proc., 38: 2127-2135.
  14. Liu, E., Chapman, M., Luizou, N. and Li, X., 2006. Applications of spectral decomposition for
  15. AVO analyses in the west of Shetland. Expanded Abstr., 76th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg.,New Orleans.
  16. Liu, G., Fomel, S. and Chen, X., 2011. Time-frequency analysis of seismic data using localattributes. Geophysics, 76(6): P23-P34.
  17. Liu, J., 2006. Spectral decomposition and its application in mapping stratigraphy and hydrocarbons.Ph.D. thesis, University of Houston, Houston.
  18. Liu, J. and Marfurt, K.J., 2005. Matching pursuit decomposition using morlet wavelets. Expanded
  19. Abstr., 75th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 786-789.
  20. Marfurt, K.J. and Kirlin, R.L., 2001. Narrow-band spectral analysis and thin-bed tuning.Geophysics, 66: 1274-1283.
  21. Odebeatu, E., 2006. Application of spectral decomposition to detection of dispersion anomaliesassociated with gas saturation. The Leading Edge, 25: 206-210.
  22. Partyka, G.A., Gridley, J. and Lopez, J., 1999. Interpretational applications of spectraldecomposition in reservoir characterization. The Leading Edge, 18: 353-360.
  23. Peyton, L., Bottjer, R. and Partyka, G.A., 1998. Interpretation of incised valleys using new 3-Dseismic techniques: A case history using spectral decomposition and coherency. The LeadingEdge, 17: 1294-1298.
  24. Pinnegar, R.C. and Mansinha, L., 2003. The S-transform with windows of arbitrary and varyingshape. Geophysics, 68: 381-385.
  25. Rutherford, S.R. and Williams, R.H., 1989. Amplitude-versus-offset variations in gas sands.Geophysics, 54: 680-688.
  26. Sattari, H., Gholami, A. and Siahkoohi, H.R., 2013. Seismic data analysis by adaptive sparsetime-frequency decomposition. Geophysics, 78(5): V207-V217.GENERATING SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES 25
  27. Sinha, S., Routh, P.S., Anno, P.D. and Castagna, J.P., 2005. Spectral decomposition of seismicdata with continuous-wavelet transform. Geophysics, 70(6): P19-P25.
  28. Stankovic, L., 2001. A measure of some time-frequency distributions concentration. Sign. Process.,81: 212-223.
  29. Stockwell, R.G., Mansinha, L. and Lowe, R., 1996. Localization of the complex spectrum: The
  30. S-transform. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 44: 998-1001.
  31. Taner, M.T., Koehler, F. and Sheriff, R.E., 1979. Complex seismic trace analysis. Geophysics, 44:1041-1063.
  32. Taner, M.T. and Sheriff, R.E., 1977. Application of amplitude, frequency, and other attributes tostratigraphic and hydrocarbon determination. In: Payton, C.E. (Ed.), Seismic
  33. Stratigraphy-Applications to Hydrocarbon Exploration. AAPG Memoir, 26: 301-327.
  34. Torrado, L., Mann, P. and Bhattacharya, J., 2014. Application of seismic attributes and spectraldecomposition for reservoir characterization of a complex fluvial system: Case study of thecarbonera formation, Llanos Foreland Basin, Colombia. Geophysics, 79(5): B221-B230.
  35. Wang, Y., 2007. Seismic time-frequency spectral decomposition by matching pursuit. Geophysics,72: V13-V20.
  36. Wang, Y., 2010. Multichannel matching pursuit for seismic trace decomposition. Geophysics, 75:V61-V66.
  37. Wu, X. and Liu, T., 2009. Spectral decomposition of seismic data with reassigned smoothed pseudo
  38. Wigner-Ville distribution. J. Appl. Geophys., 68: 386-393.
  39. Xue, Y.J., Cao, J.X. and Tian, R.F., 2013. A comparative study on hydrocarbon detection usingthree EMD-based time-frequency analysis methods. J. Appl. Geophys., 89: 926-951.
  40. Yilmaz, O., 2001. Seismic Data Analysis. SEG, Tulsa, OK.
  41. Zhang, Z., 2011. Spectral decomposition using S-transform for hydrocarbon detection and filtering.
  42. M.Sc. thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing