ARTICLE

A slim approximate Hessian for perturbation velocity inversion with incomplete reflection data

BINGHONG HE GUOCHEN WU
Show Less
School of GeoSciences, China University of Petroleum (Huadong), Qingdao, Shandong 266555, P.R. China.,
JSE 2015, 24(3), 281–304;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

He, B. and Wu, G., 2015. A slim approximate Hessian for perturbation velocity inversion with incomplete reflection data. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 24: 281-304. A recent velocity model building is the full waveform inversions (FWD that allow to recover the long-scale structures through the refraction waves and diving waves, and the short-scale structures which provide the high-resolution component through the reflection waves. However, incomplete seismic data include non-geological artifacts in the gradient for velocity update. The strong off-diagonal elements of approximate Hessians are important to reflection FWI with incomplete data; however, it is difficult to implement an approximate Hessian using the forward modeling method because of the cost of the computation efficiency. In this study, we investigate the ability of an approximate Hessian to remove artifacts that are caused by incomplete reflection data. In order to reduce the costs associated with calculating the Hessian, the large model is separated into sparse sub-models, and an alternative slim approximate Hessian is implemented sequentially on these sub-models. Afterwards, The complete model is obtained from sub-model using the radial point interpolation method (RPIM). A two-dimensional flat-layers synthetic example provides a reasonable test case for our method. We find that the slim approximate Hessian removes non-geophysical artifacts as effectively as the approximate Hessian, but has the advantages of greater cost-efficiency and lower memory requirements.

Keywords
full waveform inversion
slim approximate Hessian
reflection
incomplete data
References
  1. Connolly, P., 1999. Elastic impedance. The Leading Edge, 18: 438-452.
  2. Connolly, P., 2007. Reflections on elastic impedance. The Leading Edge, 26: 1360-1368.
  3. Fichtner, A., 2010. Full Seismic Waveform Modelling and Inversion. Advances in Geophysical and
  4. Environmental Mechanics and Mathematics. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  5. Golub, G.H. and Pereyra, V., 1973. The differentiation of pseudo-inverses and nonlinear least
  6. squares problems whose variables separate. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.,10: 413-432.
  7. Hale, D., 2009. Image-guided blended neighbor interpolation. CWP Report.
  8. Hampson, D.P., Russell, B.H. and Bankhead, B., 2012. Simultaneous inversion of pre-stack seismic
  9. data. Expanded Abstr., 82nd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Las Vegas: 1633-1637.
  10. Lailly, P., 1983. The seismic inverse problem as a sequence of before stack migrations. Conf. on
  11. Inverse Scattering: Theory and Scattering, Tulsa, OK. SIAM, Philadelphia.
  12. Lambaré, G., 2008. Stereotomography. Geophysics, 73(5): VE25-VE34.
  13. Lambaré, G. and Alerini, M., 2005. Semi automatic PP-PS Stereotomography: application to the
  14. synthetic Valhall dataset. Expanded Abstr., 75th Ann. Internat. SEG mtg., Houston:
  15. 943-946,
  16. Liu, G.-R. and Gu, Y.T., 2005. An Introduction to Meshfree Methods and Their Programming.
  17. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.
  18. Liu, G.-R., Zhang, G.Y., Gu, Y.T. and Wang, Y.Y., 2005. A meshfree radial point interpolation
  19. method (RPIM) for three-dimensional solids. Computat. Mechan., 36: 421-430.
  20. Ma, Y., 2012. Waveform-based velocity estimation from reflection seismic data. Ph.D. thesis,
  21. Colorado School of Mimes, Boulder.
  22. Nemeth, T., Wu, C. and Schuster, G.T., 1999. Least-squares migration of incomplete reflection
  23. data. Geophysics, 64: 208-221.
  24. Plessix, R.E., Baeten, G. and de Maag, J.W., 2010. Application of acoustic full waveform inversion
  25. to a low-frequency large-offset land data set. Expanded Abstr., 80th Ann. Internat. SEG
  26. Mtg., Denver.
  27. Plessix, R.E., Baeten, G., de Maag, J.W., ten Kroode, F. and Rujie, Z., 2012. Full waveform
  28. inversion and distance separated simultaneous sweeping: a study with a land seismic data set.
  29. Geophys. Prosp., 60: 733-747.
  30. Pratt, G., Shin, C. and Hicks, G.J., 1998. Gauss-Newton and full Newton methods in
  31. frequency-space seismic waveform inversion. Geophys. J. Internat., 133: 341-362.
  32. Pratt, R.G. and Worthington, M.H., 1990. Inverse theory applied to multi-source crosshole
  33. tomography. Part 1: acoustic wave-equation method. Geophys. Prosp., 38: 287-310.
  34. Ravaut, C., Operto, S., Improta, L., Virieux, J., Herrero, A. and Dell’Aversana, P., 2004.
  35. Multiscale imaging of complex structures from multifold wide-aperture seismic data by
  36. frequency-domain full-waveform tomography: application to a thrust belt. Geophys. J.
  37. Internat., 159: 1032-1056.
  38. Ren, H., Wu, R.S. and Wang, H., 2012. Least square migration with Hessian in the local angle
  39. domain. Expanded Abstr., 82nd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Las Vegas: 3010-3014.
  40. Shin, C. and Cha, Y.H., 2008. Waveform inversion in the Laplace domain. Geophys. J. Internat.,
  41. 173: 922-931.
  42. Shipp, R.M. and Singh, S.C., 2002. Two-dimensional full wavefield inversion of wide-aperture
  43. marine seismic streamer data. Geophys. J. Internat., 151: 325-344.
  44. SLIM APPROXIMATE HESSIAN 303
  45. Sirgue, L. and Pratt, R.G., 2004. Efficient waveform inversion and imaging: A strategy for
  46. selecting temporal frequencies. Geophysics, 69: 231-248.
  47. Symes, W.W. and Kern, M., 1994. Inversion of reflection seismograms by differential semblance
  48. analysis: algorithm structure and synthetic examples. Geophys. Prosp., 42: 565-614.
  49. Tarantola, A., 1984. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics,
  50. 49: 1259-1266.
  51. van Leeuwen, T. and Mulder, W.A., 2009. A variable projection method for waveform inversion.
  52. Extended Abstr., 71st EAGE Conf., Amsterdam.
  53. van Leeuwen, T. and Mulder, W.A., 2010. A comparison of seismic velocity inversion methods for
  54. layered acoustics. Inverse Probl., 26 (1), 015008.
  55. Vigh, D., 2012. Velocity determination for land data by full waveform inversion. Extended Abstr.,
  56. 74th EAGE Conf., Copenhagen: 1-5.
  57. Virieux, J. and Operto, S., 2009. An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics.
  58. Geophysics, 74(6): WCC1-WCC26.
  59. Xu, S., Wang, D., Chen, F. and Zhang, Y., 2012. Full waveform inversion for reflected seismic
  60. data. Extended Abstr., 74th EAGE Conf., Copenhagen.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing