ARTICLE

Frequency-domain acoustic and elastic modeling and waveform inversion in the logarithmic grid set

SEUNGWOO CHOI1 DONG-JOO MIN1 JU-WON OH1 WOOKEEN CHUNG2 WANSOO HA3 CHANGSOO SHIN1
Show Less
1 Seoul National University, Dept. of Energy Systems Engineering, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 151-744, South Korea, spoppy@snu.ac.kr,
2 Korea Maritime University, Dept. of Energy and Resources Engineering, 727 Taejong-ro, Yeongdo-Gu, Busan 606-791, South Korea.,
3 Pukyong National University, Dept. of Energy and Resources Engineering, 45 Yongso-ro, Nam-Gu, Busan 608-737, South Korea.,
JSE 2014, 23(2), 103–130;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Choi, S., Min, D.-J., Oh, J.-W., Chung, W., Ha, W. and Shin, C., 2014. Frequency-domain acoustic and elastic modeling and waveform inversion in the logarithmic grid set. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 23: 103-130. One of the factors influencing the accuracy of the seismic modeling is the boundary condition. Several boundary conditions have been developed and have their own advantages and disadvantages. One possible method to perfectly remove edge reflections is to extend the dimension of a given model so that the edge reflections cannot be recorded within the recording duration. To make this idea feasible without increasing computational costs, we propose acoustic and elastic modeling algorithms performed in the logarithmic grid set, where grid size increases logarithmically from the middle of model surface. This method has an advantage to reduce the number of grids by the property of logarithmic scale. For acoustic and elastic wave modeling in the logarithmic grid set, the wave equations are first converted from the uniform scale to the logarithm scale. Then we apply the conventional node-based finite-difference method for the acoustic case and the cell-based finite-difference method for the elastic case. Numerical examples show that the new modeling algorithms yield solutions comparable to those of the conventional modeling algorithm, although they can suffer from numerical dispersion when the source is located in the coarse grids (far from the origin). Inversion results for the simple layered model and the modified version of the Marmousi-2 model show that the logarithmic inversion algorithms provide results comparable to those obtained by the conventional inversion achieving computational efficiency when the recording duration is not too long and the influence of numerical dispersion is almost negligible in the inversion. We expect that computational efficiency achieved by the logarithmic grid set would be greater in 3D than in 2D.

Keywords
acoustic
elastic
seismic modeling
waveform inversion
logarithmic grid set
References
  1. Bunks, C., Saleck, F.M., Zaleski, S. and Chavent, G., 1995. Multiscale seismic waveform
  2. inversion. Geophysics, 60: 1457-1473.
  3. Cerjan, C., Kosloff, D., Kosloff, R. and Reshef, M., 1985. A nonreflecting boundary condition for
  4. discrete acoustic and elastic wave equation. Geophysics, 50: 705-708.
  5. Clayton, R. and Enquist, B., 1977. Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave
  6. equations. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 67: 1529-1540.
  7. Collino, F. and Tsogka, C., 2001. Application of the PML absorbing layer model to the linear
  8. elastodynamic problem in anisotropic heterogeneous media. Geophysics, 66: 294-307.
  9. Ewing, W.M., Jardetzky, W.S. and Press, F., 1957. Elastic Waves in Layered Media. McGraw-Hill
  10. Inc., New York.
  11. Fletcher, R. and Reeves, C.M., 1964. Function minimization by conjugate gradient. The Comput.
  12. J., 7: 149-154.
  13. FREQUENCY-DOMAIN ACOUSTIC AND ELASTIC MODELING 123
  14. Ha, W. and Shin, C., 2012. Efficient Laplace-domain modeling and inversion using an axis
  15. transformation technique. Geophysics, 77: R141-R148.
  16. Ha, T., Chung, W. and Shin, C., 2009. Waveform inversion using a back-propagation algorithm
  17. and a Huber function. Geophysics, 74(3): R15-R24.
  18. Higdon, R.L., 1991. Absorbing boundary conditions for elastic waves. Geophysics, 56: 231-241.
  19. Jastram, C. and Tessmer, E., 1994. Elastic modeling on a grid with vertically varying spacing.
  20. Geophys. Prosp., 42: 357-370.
  21. Lailly, P., 1983. The seismic inverse problem as a sequence of before stack migration. In: Bednar,
  22. J.B., Rednar, R., Robinson, E.A. and Weglein, A.B. (Eds.), Conf. on Inverse Scattering:
  23. Theory and Application. Soc. Industr. Appl. Mathem.: 206-220.
  24. Martin, G.S., Wiley, R. and Marfurt, K.J., 2006. Marmousi2: An elastic upgrade for Marmousi.
  25. The Leading Edge, 25: 156-166.
  26. Min, D.-J., Shin, C. and Yoo, H.S., 2004. Free-surface boundary condition in finite-difference
  27. elastic wave modeling. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94: 237-250.
  28. Moczo, P., 1989. Finite-difference technique for SH waves in 2-D media using irregular grids:
  29. application to the seismic response problem. Geophys. J. Internat., 99: 321-329.
  30. Pratt, R.G., Shin, C. and Hicks, G.J., 1998. Gauss-Newton and full Newton methods in
  31. frequency-space seismic waveform inversion. Geophys. J. Internat., 133: 341-362.
  32. Reynolds, A.C., 1978. Boundary conditions for the numerical solution of wave propagation
  33. problems. Geophysics, 43: 1099-1110.
  34. Roach, G.F., 1982. Green’s Functions (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  35. Shin, C., 1995. Sponge boundary condition for frequency-domain modeling. Geophysics, 60:
  36. 1870-1874.
  37. Shin, C., Jang, S. and Min, D.-J., 2001. Improved amplitude preservation for prestack depth
  38. migration by inverse scattering theory. Geophys. Prosp., 49: 592-606.
  39. Tarantola, A., 1984. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics,
  40. 49: 1259-1266.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing