ARTICLE

The influence of seismic wavelet phase on reflection coefficient inversion results

YANAN ZHANG YONGSHOU DAI JINJIE DING MANMAN ZHANG RONGRONG WANG
Show Less
College of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Dongying 257061, P. R. China.,
JSE 2014, 23(2), 131–152;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Zhang, Y., Dai, Y., Ding, J., Zhang, M. and Wang, R., 2014. The influence of seismic wavelet phase on reflection coefficient inversion results. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 23: 131-152. To research the influence of seismic wavelet phase on reflection coefficient inversion, an Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) model was used to describe the seismic wavelet, the wavelets with the same amplitude spectrum and different phase spectra were constructed by symmetrical mapping Pole-Zeros of the ARMA model in the z-domain, and spectrum division was used to implement reflection coefficient inversion. The theoretical analysis shows that a phase-only filter was remained after reflection coefficient inversion in the condition of inaccurate seismic wavelet phase estimation, and the phase spectrum of the phase-only filter was the phase spectrum difference between real wavelet and constructed wavelet. The real or accurate reflection coefficient sequences were identified in inversion results by the evaluation methods of Kurtosis and Variation. Simulation and actual seismic data processing results also verified the law of the wavelet phase influence on reflection coefficient inversion and the effectiveness of the evaluation methods. Research interest for enhancing the precision of reflection coefficient inversion results was indicated.

Keywords
seismic wavelet
reflection coefficient inversion
phase-only filter
kurtosis
variation
References
  1. Cui, Q.H., Rui, Y.J. and Shang, X.M., 2011. Mixed-phase seismic wavelet extraction and its
  2. application. Geophys. Prosp. for Petrol., 50: 481-486.
  3. Dai, Y.S., Wang, J.L. and Wang, W.W., 2008. Seismic wavelet extraction via cumulant-based
  4. ARMA model approach with linear and nonlinear combination. Chin. J. Geophys. (in
  5. Chinese), 51: 1851-1859.
  6. Levy, S. and Oldenburg, D.W., 1982. The deconvolution of phase-shifted wavelets. Geophysics,
  7. 47: 1285-1294. :
  8. Levy, S. and Oldenburg, D.W., 1987. Automatic phase correction of common-midpoint stacked
  9. data. Geophysics, 52: 51-59.
  10. Liang, G.H., 1998. On the methods of seismic wavelet extraction. Geophys. Prosp. for Petrol. (in
  11. Chinese), 37: 31-39.
  12. Robinson, E.A., 1967. Predictive decomposition of time series with application to seismic
  13. exploration. Geophysics, 32: 418-484.
  14. Sacchi, M.D., 1997. Re-weighting strategies in seismic deconvolution. Geophys. J. Internat., 12:
  15. 651-656.
  16. Tang, B. and Yin, C., 2001. Non-minimum phase seismic wavelet reconstruction based on higher
  17. order statistics. Chin. J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 44: 404-410.
  18. Wang, Y.H., 2003. A stable and efficient approach of inverse Q filtering. Geophysics, 67: 657-663.
  19. Wang, Y.H., 2006. Inverse Q filter for seismic resolution enhancement. Geophysics, 71: 51-60.
  20. Wiggins, R., 1978. Minimum entropy deconvolution. Geoexplor., 16: 21-35.
  21. Wiggins, R., 1983. Entropy guided deconvolution. Geophysics, 50: 2720-2726.
  22. Wu, Z.Y., 2004. Digital signal processing. Higher Education Press, Beijing.
  23. Yi, Z.L. and Wang, R.Q., 2006. A new mixed phase deconvolution method. Oil Geophys. Prosp.,
  24. 41: 266-270.
  25. Yuan, S.Y. and Wang, S.X., 2010. Noise attenuation without spatial assumptions about seismic
  26. coherent events. Expanded Abstr, 80th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Denver: 3524-3528.
  27. Yuan, S.Y. and Wang, S.X., 2011. Influence of inaccurate wavelet phase estimation on seismic
  28. inversion. Appl. Geophys., 8: 48-59.
  29. 152 ZHANG, DAI, DING, ZHANG & WANG
  30. Zhang, G.Z., Liu, H. and Yin, X.Y., 2005. Method for fine picking up seismic wavelet at up-hole
  31. trace. Oil Geophys. Prosp., 40: 158-162.
  32. Zhang, K., Li, Y.D. and Liu, G.Z., 1999. Multiresolution seismic signal deconvolution. Chin. J.
  33. Geophys. (in Chinese), 42: 529-535.
  34. Zhang, R. and Castagna, J., 2011. Seismic sparse-layer reflectivity inversion using basis pursuit
  35. decomposition. Geophysics, 76: 147-158.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing