ARTICLE

Study of least squares support vector regression filtering technology with a new 2D Ricker wavelet kernel

XIAOYING DENG1 DINGHUI YANG2 TAO LIU3 BAOJUN YANG4
Show Less
1 Department of Electronic Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, P. R. China. xydeng@bit.edu.cn,
2 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. China. dhyang@math.tsinghua.edu.cn,
3 Military Representative Office of PLA in Second Research Institute of CASIC, Beijing 100854, P. R. China.,
4 Department of Geophysics, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, P. R. China. yangbaojun@jlu.edu.cn,
JSE 2011, 20(2), 161–176;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Deng, X., Yang, D., Liu, T. and Yang, B., 2011. Study of least squares support vector regression filtering technology with a new 2D Ricker wavelet kernel. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 20: 161- 176. To suppress the random noise in seismic data, the least squares support vector regression (LS-SVR) filtering technology with a new 2D Ricker wavelet kernel is proposed in this paper. Firstly, we prove that the 2D Ricker wavelet kernel is an admissible support vector kernel. The proposed 2D Ricker wavelet kernel takes into account the characteristics of seismic data in the time-space domain. And the kernel parameters of the 2D Ricker wavelet kernel reflect the dominant frequency of seismic data in time domain and the wavenumber of seismic data in space domain, which will help the difficult problem of parameters selection for LS-SVR. Then by solving a quadratic optimization problem with constrains, we can obtain the regression function so as to compute the filtered output. The simulation experiments on synthetic records show that compared with the LS-SVR using 1D Ricker wavelet kerne] and the common f-x prediction filtering method, the proposed method can suppress the random noise more efficiently, and enhance the continuity of events greatly. An example on a real seismic data processing also proves the effectiveness of the proposed method. So the LS-SVR with the 2D Ricker wavelet kernel can be used to attenuate the random noise in seismic data.

Keywords
2D Ricker wavelet kernel
least squares support vector regression
seismic data
random noise reduction
References
  1. Bednar, J.B., 1983. Applications of median filtering to deconvolution, pulse estimation, and
  2. statistical editing of seismic data. Geophysics, 48: 1598-1610.
  3. Bekara, M., Baan, M.V.D. and Mirko, V.D.B., 2007. Local singular value decomposition for signal
  4. enhancement of seismic data. Geophysics, 72: 59-65.
  5. Bekara, M. and Baan, M.V.D., 2009. Random and coherent noise attenuation by empirical mode
  6. decomposition. Geophysics, 74: 89-98.
  7. Canales, L., 1984. Random noise reduction. Expanded Abstr., 54th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg.,
  8. Atlanta: 525-527.
  9. Cherkassky, V. and Ma, Y.Q., 2004. Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation
  10. for SVM regression. Neural Networks, 17: 113-126.
  11. Deng, X., Yang, D. and Xie, J., 2009. Noise reduction by support vector regression with Ricker
  12. wavelet kernel. J. Geophys. Engin., 6: 177-188.
  13. Deng, X., Yang, D., Peng, J., Guan, X. and Yang, B., 2010. Noise reduction and drift removal
  14. using least squares support vector regression with implicit bias term. Geophysics, 75: 119-
  15. Duncan, G. and Beresford, G., 1995. Median filter behavior with seismic data. Geophys. Prosp.,
  16. 43: 329-345.
  17. Jones, 1.F. and Levy, S., 1987. Signal-to-noise ratio enhancement in multichannel seismic data via
  18. the Karhunen-Loeve transform. Geophys. Prosp., 35: 12-32.
  19. Karsli, H., Dondurur, D. and Cifci, G., 2006. Application of complex-trace analysis to seismic data
  20. for random-noise suppression and temporal resolution improvement. Geophysics, 71: 79-86.
  21. 176 DENG, YANG, LIU & YANG
  22. Liu, Y., Liu, C. and Wang, D., 2009. A 1D time-varying median filter for seismic random,
  23. spike-like noise elimination. Geophysics, 74: 17-24.
  24. Lu, W., 2006. Adaptive noise attenuation of seismic images based on singular value decomposition
  25. and texture direction detection. J. Geophys. Engin., 3: 28-34.
  26. Mercer, J., 1909. Functions of positive and negative type and their connection with the theory of
  27. integral equations. Philosoph. Transact. Roy. Soc. London, Series A 209: 415-446.
  28. Sacchi, M.D. and Kuehl, H., 2000. ARMA formulation of FX prediction error filters and projection
  29. filters. J. Seismic Explor., 9: 185-197.
  30. Suykens, J.A.K. and Vandewalle, J., 1999. Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural
  31. Process. Lett., 9: 293-300.
  32. Vapnik, V.N., 1995. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  33. Wang, Y., 1999. Random noise attenuation using forward-backward linear prediction. J. Seismic
  34. Explor., 8: 133-142.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing