CNN-based adaptive subtraction for the removal of seismic multiples

Li, Z.X., Xie, F., Ma, J.H., Qi, Z. and Wang, Y., 2023. CNN-based adaptive subtraction for the removal of seismic multiples. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 32: 169-184. In seismic data processing primaries are usually distorted by multiples which need to be removed in advance before seismic imaging. After multiple modelling, adaptive subtraction is essential for removing multiples successfully and can be expressed as a problem of linear regression (LR) with L1 norm minimization constraint on primaries or support vector regression (SVR). Compared to the LR-based method, the SVR-based method achieves better separation of primaries and multiples since it transforms the modelled multiples nonlinearly for a better match with the true multiples in every 2D data window. However, the LR- or SVR-based method may harm primaries or cause residual multiples in complex subsurface media. In this paper a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) is constructed to better express the complicated mismatches between the modelled multiples (input data) and true multiples of the original data (label) than the LR or SVR model. To avoid overfitting to the original data and preserve primaries the L1 norm minimization constraint on primaries and L2 norm minimization constraint on CNN coefficients are used in the optimization problem. During CNN training multiple 2D data windows constructed with one or several gathers are used simultaneously to avoid overfitting. The trained CNN is used in the corresponding training data to remove multiples and then the same flowchart with CNN is used in other gathers. The proposed CNN-based method extracts high-level features of the modelled multiples to remove multiples. It is demonstrated in the synthetic and field data examples that the proposed CNN-based method can better remove multiples and preserve primaries than the LR- or SVR-based method.
- Abma, R., Kabir, N., Matson, K.H., Michell, S., Shaw, S.A. and McLain, B., 2005.
- Comparisons of adaptive subtraction methods for multiple attenuation. The Leading
- Edge, 24: 277-280.
- Berkhout, A.J. and Verschuur, D.J., 1997. Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative
- inversion, Part I: Theoretical considerations. Geophysics, 62: 1586-1595.
- Bishop, K., Keliher, J., Paffenholz, J., Stoughton, D., Michell, S., Ergas, R. and Hadidi,
- M., 2001. Investigation of vendor demultiple technology for complex subsalt geology.
- Expanded Abstr, 71 st Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., San Antonio: 1273-1276.
- Bugge, A.J., Evensen, A.K., Lie, J.E. and Nilsen, E.H., 2021. Demonstrating multiple
- attenuation with model-driven processing using neural networks. The Leading Edge,
- 40: 831-836.
- Cheng, G., Zhou, P. and Han, J., 2016. Learning rotation-invariant convolutional neural
- networks for object detection in VHR optical remote sensing images. IEEE Transact.
- Geosci. Remote Sens., 54: 7405-7415.
- Donno, D., 2011. Improving multiple removal using least-squares dip filters and
- independent component analysis. Geophysics, 76(5): V91-V104.
- Gao, Z., Pan, Z., Zuo, C., Gao, J. and Xu, Z., 2019. An optimized deep network
- representation of multimutation differential evolution and its application in seismic
- inversion. IEEE Transact. Geosci. Remote Sens., 57: 4720-4734.
- Geng, Z., Wu, X., Shi, Y. and Fomel, S., 2020. Deep learning for relative geologic time
- and seismic horizons. Geophysics, 85: 1-47.
- Guitton, A. and Verschuur, D.J., 2004. Adaptive subtraction of multiples using the L1-
- norm. Geophys.Prosp., 52: 27-38.
- Guitton, A., 2005. Multiple attenuation in complex geology with a pattern-based
- approach. Geophysics, 70(Issue No. ???):: V97-V 107.
- He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. and Sun, J., 2016. Deep residual learning for image
- recognition. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., Las Vegas: 770-778.
- Jiao, Q., Ma, J., Chi, L., Liao, Z. and Li, C., 2021. Surface-related multiple attenuation
- based on deep learning. 82nd EAGE Conf., Amsterdam: 1-5.
- Jin, K.H., McCann, M.T., Froustey, E. and Unser, M., 2017. Deep convolutional neural
- network for inverse problems in imaging. IEEE Transact. Image Process., 26: 4509-
- Kaplan, S.T. and Innanen, K.A., 2008. Adaptive separation of free-surface multiples
- through independent component analysis. Geophysics, 73(4): V29-V36.
- Kaur, H., Pham, N. and Fomel, S., 2019. Seismic data interpolation using CycleGAN.
- Expanded Abstr., 89 th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., San Antonio: 2202-2206.
- Kingma, D.P. and Ba, J.L., 2015. Adam: A Method for stochastic optimization. Internat.
- Conf. Learning Representat., San Diego: 1-15.
- Kumar, A., Hampson, G. and Rayment, T., 2021. Adaptive subtraction using a
- convolutional neural network. First Break, 39: 35-45.
- LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. and Hinton, G., 2015. Deep learning. Nature, 521: 436-444.
- Liu, D., Wang, W., Wang, X., Wang, C., Pei, J., and Chen, W., 2020. Poststack seismic
- data denoising based on 3-D convolutional neural network. IEEE Transact. Geosci.
- Remote Sens., 58: 1598-1629.
- Liu, J., Lu, W., and Zhang, Y., 2017. Adaptive multiple subtraction based on sparse
- coding. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55: 1318-1324.
- Li, Z.-X., 2020. Adaptive multiple subtraction based on support vector regression.
- Geophysics, 85(3): V57-V69.
- Li, Z. and Gao, H., 2020. Feature extraction based on the convolutional neural network
- for adaptive multiple subtraction. Marine Geophys. Res., 41: 10.
- Li, Z.-X. and Li, Z.-C., 2018. Accelerated 3D blind separation of convolved mixtures
- based on the fast iterative shrinkage thresholding algorithm for adaptive multiple
- subtraction. Geophysics, 83(1): V99-V113.
- Li, Z.-X. and Li, Z.-C., 2017. Accelerated parabolic Radon domain 2D adaptive multiple
- subtraction with fast iterative shrinkage thresholding algorithm and its application in
- parabolic Radon domain hybrid demultiple method. J. Appl. Geophys., 143: 86-102.
- Li, Z., Sun, N., Gao, H., Qin, N. and Li, Z., 2021. Adaptive subtraction based on U-net
- for removing seismic multiples. IEEE Transact. Geosci. Remote Sens., 59: 9796-9812.
- Mousa, W.A., 2014. Imaging of the SEG/EAGE salt model seismic data using sparse f-x
- finite-impulse-response wavefield extrapolation filters. IEEE Transact. Geosci.
- Remote Sens., 52: 2700-2714.
- Neelamani, R.N., Baumstein, A. and Ross, W.S., 2010. Adaptive subtraction using
- complex-valued curvelet transforms. Geophysics, 75(2): V51-V60.
- Schmidhuber, J., 2015. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Netw.,
- 61: 85-117.
- Siahkoohi, A., Verschuur, D.J. and Herrmann, F.J., 2019. Surface-related multiple
- elimination with deep learning. Expanded Abstr., 89th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., San
- Antonio: 4629-4634.
- Spitz, S., 1999. Pattern recognition, spatial predictability, and subtraction of multiple
- events. Geophysics, 18: 55-58.
- Verschuur, D.J. and Berkhout, A.J., 1997. Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative
- inversion; Part II, Practical aspects and examples. Geophysics, 62: 1596-1611.
- Verschuur, D.J., 2006. Seismic Multiple Removal Techniques: Past, Present and Future.
- EAGE, Houten.
- Yang, F. and Ma, J., 2019. Deep-learning inversion: A next-generation seismic velocity
- model building method. Geophysics, 84(4): R585-R584.
- Yuan, S., Liu, J., Wang, S., Wang, T. and Shi, P., 2018. Seismic waveform classification
- and first-break picking using convolution neural networks. IEEE Geosci. Remote
- Sens. Lett., 15: 272-276.
- Yu, S., Ma, J. and Wang, W., 2019. Deep learning for denoising. Geophysics, 84(6):
- V333-V350.
- Zhang, D., Leeuw, M. and Verschuur, E., 2021. Deep learning-based seismic surface-
- related multiple adaptive subtraction with synthetic primary labels. Expanded Abstr.,
- First Internat. Mtg. Appl. Geosci. Energy, Denver: 2844-2848.
- Zhang, K., Zuo, W., Chen, Y., Meng, D. and Zhang, L., 2017. Beyond a Gaussian
- denoiser: Residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Transact. Image
- Process., 26: 3142-3155.