ARTICLE

The effects of multi-scale heterogeneities on wave-equation migration

YONG MA PAUL SAVA
Show Less
Center for Wave Phenomena, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.,
JSE 2009, 18(4), 357–383;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Ma, Y. and Sava, P., 2009. The effects of multi-scale heterogeneities on wave-equation migration. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 18: 357-383. Velocity models used for wavefield-based seismic imaging represent approximations of the velocity characterizing the area under investigation. We can conceptually decompose the real velocity model into a background component which can be inferred using conventional velocity analysis techniques, and into another component encapsulating the model heterogeneities. This unknown component is responsible for mispositioning of reflection energy which usually takes the form of imaging artifacts. Model heterogeneity can be described stochastically using, for example, correlated Gaussian random distributions or fractal distributions. Data simulated for the various distributions are characterized by spectra with different shapes when analyzed in the log-log domain. For example, Gaussian distributions are characterized by exponential functions and fractal distributions are characterized by linear functions with fractional slopes. These properties hold for both data and migrated images after deconvolution of the source wavelet. On the other hand, the image heterogeneities induced by model heterogeneities can be considered as noise to be removed by an image filtering operation. Among many possibilities, filtering with the seislet transform (a wavelet transform technique) and Gabor-Wigner distribution (a time-frequency analysis technique) are effective at suppressing noise, although both techniques affect the signal corresponding to the major geologic structure. Such filtering can be applied at different stages of wave-equation imaging, for example on data, on the reconstructed wavefields, or on the migrated image. Of all possibilities, filtering of the reconstructed wavefields is most effective.

Keywords
heterogeneity
fractal
multi-scale
noise attenuation
wave-equation migration
References
  1. Borcea, L., Papanicolaou, G. and Tsogka, C., 2006. Coherent interferometric imaging in clutter.
  2. Geophysics, 71: SI165-SI175.
  3. Choi, H.L and Williams, W.J., 1989. Improved time-frequency representation of multicomponent
  4. signals using exponential kernels. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Proces. , 37: 862-871.
  5. Claerbout, J.F., 1985. Imaging the Earth’s Interior. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Cambridge.
  6. Cohen, L., 1995. Time Frequency Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  7. Dolan, S.S., Bean, C.J. and Riollet, B., 1998. The broad-band fractal nature of heterogeneity in the
  8. upper crust from petrophysical logs. Geophys. J. Internat., 132: 489-507.
  9. Fomel, S., 2006. Towards the seislet transform. Expanded Abstr., 76th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg.,
  10. New Orleans, 25: 2847-2850.
  11. Hlawatsch, F. and Boudereaux-Bartels, G.F., 1992. Linear and quadratic time-frequency signal
  12. representation. IEEE Signal Proc., 24: 21-67.
  13. Hoshiba, M., 2000. Large fluctuation of wave amplitude produced by small fluctuation of velocity
  14. structure. Phys. Earth Plan. Inter., 120: 201-217.
  15. Lehmann, E.L. and Casella, G., 2003. Theory of Point Estimation, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, Ney
  16. York.
  17. Mandelbrot, B.B., 1982. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.
  18. Pei, S.C. and Ding, J.J., 2007. Relations between Gabor transforms and fractional Fourier
  19. transforms and their applications for signal processing. Signal Proc., IEEE Transact., 55:
  20. 4839-4850.
  21. Richter-Bernburg, G., 1987. Deformation within salt bodies in dynamical geology of salt and related
  22. structures. Academic Press, New York.
  23. Sava, P. and Poliannikov, O., 2008. Interferometric imaging condition for wave-equation migration.
  24. Geophysics, 73: $47-S61.
  25. Shtatland, E.S., 1991. Fractal stochastic models for acoustic impedance: An explanation of scaling
  26. or 1/f geology and stochastic inversion. Expanded Abstr., 61th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg.,
  27. Houston: 1598-1601.
  28. Stefani, J. and De, G.S., 2001. On the power-law behavior of subsurface heterogeneity. Expanded
  29. Abstr., 71st Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., San Antonio: 2033-2036.
  30. Turcotte, D.L., 1997. Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics. Cambridge University Press,
  31. Cambridge.
  32. Ville, J., 1948. Theorie et applications de la notion de signal analytique. Cables et Transmissions,
  33. 2A: 61-74
  34. Wigner, E., 1932. On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium. Physical Rev., 40:
  35. 749-759.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing