ARTICLE

Solving wave equations in the curvelet domain: a multi-scale and multi-directional approach

BINGBING SUN1 JIANWEI MA1,2 HERVÉ CHAURIS3 HUIZHU YANG1
Show Less
1 Institute of Seismic Exploration, School of Aerospace, Tsinghua University, P.R. China.,
3 Centre de Géosciences, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France. herve.chauris@mines-paristech.fr,
JSE 2009, 18(4), 385–399;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Sun, B., Ma, J., Chauris, H. and Yang, H., 2009. Solving wave equations in the curvelet domain: a multi-scale and multi-directional approach. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 18: 385-399. Seismic imaging is a key step in seismic exploration to retrieve the earth properties from seismic measurements at the surface. One needs to properly model the response of the earth by solving the wave equation. We present how curvelets can be used in that respect. Curvelets can be seen from the geophysical point of view as the representation of local plane waves. The unknown pressure, solution of the wave equation, is decomposed in the curvelet domain. We derive the new associated equation for the curvelet coefficients and show how to solve it. In this paper, we focus on a simple homogeneous model to illustrate the feasibility of the curvelet-based method. This is a first step towards the modeling in more complex models. In particular, we express the derivative of the wave field in the curvelet domain. The simulation results show that our algorithm can give a multi-scale and multi-directional view of the wave propagation. A potential application is to model the wave motion in some specific directions. We also discuss the current limitations of this approach, in particular the extension to more complex models.

Keywords
curvelets
wavelets
numerical simulation
wave equation
multi-scale
multi-directional
adaptive
References
  1. Alford, R.M., Kelly, K.R. and Boore, D.M., 1974. Accuracy of finite difference modeling of the
  2. acoustic wave equation. Geophysics, 39: 834-842.
  3. Alterman, Z. and Karal, F.C., 1968. Propagation of elastic waves in layered media by finite
  4. difference methods. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am, 58: 367-398.
  5. Andersson, F., de Hoop, M.V., Smith, H. and Uhlmann, G., 2003. A multi-scale approach to
  6. hyperbolic evolution equations with limited smoothness communications in partial differential
  7. equations. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 33: 988-1017.
  8. Antoine, J.P., Murenzi, R., Vandergheynst, P. and Ali, S.T., 2004. Two-dimensional wavelets and
  9. their relatives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  10. Candés, E.J. and Demanet, L., 2005. The curvelet representation of wave propagators is optimally
  11. sparse. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 58: 1472-1528.
  12. Candés, E.J. and Donoho, D.L., 2000, Curvelet a surprisingly effective nonadaptive representation
  13. for objects with edges. Curves and Surfaces, Vanderbilt University Press: 105-120.
  14. Candés, E.J. and Donoho, D.L., 2003. Curvelets and Fourier Integral Operators. C.R. Acad. Sci.
  15. Paris, 1: 395-398.
  16. Candés, E.J. and Donoho, D.L., 2004. New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations
  17. of objects with piecewise C? singularities. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 57: 219-266.
  18. Candés, E.J., Demanet, L., Donoho, D.L. and Ying, L., 2005. Fast discrete curvelet transforms.
  19. Multiscale. Model. Simul., 5: 861-899.
  20. Carrer, J., Mansur, W. and Vanzuit, R., 2008. Scalar wave equation by the boundary element
  21. method: a D-BEM approach with non-homogeneous initial conditions. Computat. Mechan.,
  22. 44: 31-44.
  23. Chauris, H. and Nguyen, T.T., 2008. Seismic demigration/migration in the curvelet domain.
  24. Geophysics, 73: 35-46.
  25. Daubechies, I., 1992. Ten Lectures on Wavelets. SIAM, Philadelphia.
  26. Demanet, L., 2006. Curvelets, Wave Atoms and Wave Equations. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute
  27. of Technology, Pasadena.
  28. Douma, H. and de Hoop, M.V., 2007. Leading-order seismic imaging using curvelets. Geophysics,
  29. 72: 231-248.
  30. Fornberg, B., 1989. Pseudospectral approximation of the elastic wave equation on staggered grid.
  31. Expanded Abstr., 59th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Dallas, 8: 1047-1049.
  32. Funato, K. and Fukui, T., 1999. Time domain boundary element method for wave propagation. in
  33. biot material. Proc. Japan Nat. Symp. Boundary Element Meth., 16: 7-12.
  34. Gazdag, J., 1981. Modeling of the acoustic wave equation with transform methods. Geophysics, 46:
  35. 854-859.
  36. Herrmann, F.J., Wang, D., Hennenfent, G. and Moghaddam, P.P., 2008.
  37. Curvelet-based seismic data processing: A multiscale and nonlinear approach. Geophysics,
  38. 73: Al-AS.
  39. Hong, T.K. and Kennett, B.L., 2002a, A wavelet based method for simulation of two-dimensional
  40. elastic wave propagation. Geophys. J. Internat., 150: 610-638.
  41. WAVE EQUATION IN THE CURVELET DOMAIN 399
  42. Hong, T.K. and Kennett, B.L., 2002b. A wavelet based method for the numerical simulation of
  43. wave propagation. J. Comput. Phys., 183, 577-622.
  44. Kelly, K., Ward, R. and Treitel, S., 1976. Synthetic seismograms: a finite-difference approach.
  45. Geophysics, 41: 2-27.
  46. Kosloff, D. and Baysal, E., 1982. Forward modeling by a Fourier method. Geophysics, 47:
  47. 1402-1412.
  48. Lin, T. and Herrmann, F.J., 2007. Compressed wavefield extrapolation. Geophysics, 72:
  49. SM77-SM93.
  50. Lysmer, J. and Draker, L., 1972. A finite element method for seismology in methods in
  51. computational physics, Vol. 11. Academic Press, New York.
  52. Ma, J., Gang, T. and Hussaini, M., 2007. A refining estimation for adaptive solution of wave
  53. equation based on curvelets. Proc. SPIE, San Diego: 67012J.
  54. Ma, J. and Plonka, G., 2007. Combined curvelet shrinkage and nonlinear anisotropic diffusion.
  55. IEEE Trasnsact. Image Process., 16: 2198-2206.
  56. Ma, J. and Plonka, G., 2009a. Computing with curvelets: from imaging processing to turbulent
  57. flows. IEEE J. Comput. Sci. Eng., 11: 72-80.
  58. Ma, J. and Plonka, G., 2009b. A review of curvelets and recent applications. IEEE Signal Process.
  59. Magaz., in press.
  60. Ma, J., Yang, H. and Zhu, Y., 2001. MRFD method for numerical solution of wave propagation
  61. in layered media with general boundary condition. Electron. Lett., 37: 1267-1268.
  62. Meyer, Y., 1992. Wavelet and Operators. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  63. Mullen, R. and Belytschko, T., 1982. Dispersion analysis of finite element semidiscretizations of
  64. the two-dimensional wave equation. Internat. J. Numerical Methods in Engin., 18: 11-29.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing