ARTICLE

Enhancement of seismic image quality by least squares reverse time migration case study Albertine graben south western Uganda

MUKIIBI SSEWANNYAGA IVAN1 JIAN-PING HUANG2 XINRU MU3 JIDONG YANG4
Show Less
1,3,4 Geosciences Department, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, P.R. China.,
2 Pilot Laboratory for Marine Sciences and Technology, Qingdao 266000, P.R. China.,
JSE 2022, 31(6), 523–544;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Reverse Time Migration (RTM) is a conventional two-way wave-based method up to date known as the most popular imaging technique for complex subsurface structures. The technique uses the adjoint wave field to approximate the inverse component of the migration. The adjoint is a bit inaccurate which limits the resolution, image quality, balance of amplitudes of the final image. Least squares reverse time migration (LSRTM) is an iteration technique which can overcome the challenges faced by RTM as we incorporate the Least Square Inversion (LSI) algorithm into the RTM. Numerical tests were carried out on two models that is; multi-layer model (listric faults), positive flower structure model to validate the effectiveness of LSRTM technique in seismic imaging. Single trace comparison between the reference/true reflectivity to the RTM (LSRTM =1), LSRTM at the 10th and 30th iteration was analyzed for all the models. A clear strong positive correlation between true reflectivity and 30th iteration image was noted for all the two models in comparison with the RTM image. High convergence rates were noted after plotting the data residuals against iteration numbers. In all models a sharp decrease in the data residuals were noted before the 10th iteration followed by a gradual decline from 10th to 30th. LSRTM can greatly suppress migration artefacts, acquisition noise and amplify the signal, balance the amplitude as portrayed on the single trace comparison diagrams for all models and enhance resolution (thinner reflection events) in comparison with RTM images. The algorithm is highly sensitive to low S/N ratio noise but good images are guaranteed at high S/N ratio above 10.0 dB.

Keywords
migration
imaging
signal-to-noise ratio
inversion
Flower structure
References
  1. Aster, R.C., Borchers, B. and Thurber, C.H., 2005. Parameter estimation and Inverse
  2. Problems. Academic Press, New York.
  3. Caldwell, J., 1999. Marine multicomponent seismology. The Leading Edge, 18: 1274-
  4. doi: 10.1190/1.1438198
  5. Chang, W.F. and McMechan, G.A., 1987. Elastic reverse-time migration. Geophysics,
  6. 52, 1365-1375. doi: 10.1190/1.1442249
  7. Claerbout, J.F., 1992. Earth Soundings Analysis: Processing Versus Inversion. Blackwell
  8. Science, Boston.
  9. Dai, W., Fowler, P. and Schuster, G.T., 2012. Multi-source least-squares reverse time
  10. migration. Geophys. Prosp., 60: 681-695.
  11. Dong, S., Cai, J., Guo, M., Suh, S., Zhang, Z., Wang, B. and Li, Z., 2012. Least-squares
  12. reverse time migration: towards true amplitude imaging and improving the
  13. resolution. Expanded Abstr., 82nd Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston, 31: 1-5.
  14. Dou, L., Wang, J., Cheng, D., Ran, X., Rubondo, E.N.T., Kasande, R., Byakagaba, A.
  15. and Mugisha, F., 2004. Geological conditions and petroleum exploration potential of
  16. the Albertine graben of Uganda. Acta Geologica Sinica ,78; 1002-1010.
  17. Fan, J., Li, Z., Zhang, K., Zhang, M. and Liu, X., 2016. Multisource least-squares
  18. reverse-time migration with structure-oriented filtering. Appl. Geophys., 13: 491-
  19. doi: 10.1007/s11770-016-0580-y
  20. Fang, J., Zhou, H., Chen, H., Wang, N., Wang, Y., Sun, P. and Zhang, J., 2019. Source-
  21. independent elastic least-squares reverse time migration. Geophysics, 84(1): S1-S16.
  22. doi: 10.1190/GEO2017-0847.1
  23. Grohmann, M., Miiller, S. and Niederleithinger, E., 2015. Reverse time migration:
  24. introduction of a new imaging technique for ultrasonic measurements in civil
  25. engineering. Internat. Symp., Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDT-
  26. CE), Berlin, Germany: 1-10.
  27. Hao, H., Yike, L., Yingcai, Z., Xuejian L. and Huiyi, L., 2016. Least-squares Gaussian
  28. beam migration. Geophysics, 81(3): S87-S100. doi: 10.1190/ge02015 0238.1
  29. Hu, W., Abubakar, A. and Habashy, T.M., 2007. Application of the nearly perfectly
  30. matched layer in acoustic wave modeling. Geophysics, 72(5): SM169-SM175.
  31. doi: 10.1190/1.2738553.
  32. Kiconco, R., 2005. The Semliki Basin its Sedimentation History and Stratigraphy in
  33. Relation to Petroleum Accumulation. M.Sc. thesis, University of Capetown.
  34. Kiihl, H. and Sacchi, M.D., 2003. Least-squares wave-equation migration for AVP/AVA
  35. inversion. Geophysics, 68: 262-273. doi: 10.1190/1 .1543212.
  36. Lei, Y., Trad, O.D. and Wenyong, P., 2018. Comparison between least-squares reverse
  37. time migration and full-waveform inversion. Geoconvention, Calgary, AB.
  38. Li, C., Huang, J. P., Li, Z. C. and Wang, R.R., 2017b. Plane-wave least-squares reverse
  39. time migration with a preconditioned stochastic conjugate gradient method.
  40. Geophysics, 83(1): S33-S46. doi: 10.1190/geo2017-0339.1.
  41. Mu, X., Huang, J. P., Yong, P., Huang, J. Q. and Guo X., 2020. Least-squares reverse
  42. time migration in TTI media using a pure qP-wave equation. Geophysics, 85(4):
  43. $199-S216. doi: 10.1190/GEO2019-0320.1
  44. Nemeth, T., Wu, C.J. and Schuster, G.T., 1999. Least-squares migration of incomplete
  45. reflection data. Geophysics, 64: 208-221. doi: 10.1190/1 .1444517
  46. Pickford, M., Senut, B. and Hadito, D., 1993. Geology and Paleobiology of the Albertine
  47. Rift Valley , Uganda-Zaire, CIFEG Publication Occassionale 1994/24, 179pp.
  48. Ping, W., Shouting, H., and Ming, W., 2017. Least-squares RTM theory and application.
  49. 15th Internat. Congr., Brazil. Geophys. Soc.: 1-5.
  50. Plessix, R.E. and Mulder, W.A., 2004. Frequency-domain finite-difference amplitude-
  51. preserving migration. Geophys. J. Internat., 157: 975-987.
  52. Sauer, T., 2012. Numerical Analysis, 2nd Ed. Pearson Education Asia Ltd., ISBN 978-7-
  53. 111-38582-0
  54. Tarantola, A., 1984. Linearized inversion of seismic reflection data. Geophys. Prosp., 32:
  55. 998-1015.
  56. Yang, J., Liu, Y., Yunyue, E., Li, E.Y., Cheng, A., Dong, L. and Du, Y., 2019. Joint
  57. least-squares reverse time migration of primary and prismatic waves. Geophysics,
  58. 84(1): $29-S40. doi: 10.1190/GEO2017-0850. 1
  59. Yao, G., 2013. Least Square Reverse-Time Migration. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College,
  60. London.
  61. Yao, G. and Wu, D., 2015. Least-squares reverse-time migration for reflectivity imaging.
  62. China Earth Sci., 58: 1982-1992. doi: 10.1007/s11430-015-5143-1
  63. Yongming, L. and Qiancheng, L., 2019. A comparison of two _ reflectivity
  64. parametrizations in acoustic least-squares reverse time migration. Explor. Geophys.,
  65. 51: 256-269. doi: 10.1080/08123985.2019.1682459
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing