A new automatic first break picking method based on the STA/LTA fractal dimension algorithm
Esmaeili, S., 2022. A new automatic first break picking method based on the STA/LTA fractal dimension algorithm. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 31: 253-265. This paper describes a new approach to seismic first break picking based on comparing short-time averages (STA) with long-time averages (LTA) of transformed amplitudes and consideration the fractal dimension variations along the seismic traces. Reliable and accurate detection of first breaks is a key step for the determination of seismic parameters. The results of tests show that this method is quite reliable and is less susceptible to false-positive detection errors. Also by this approach, the result is an improvement in total picks, accuracy, and consistency. A small range of thresholds can be used for a wide range of seismic signals with different noise levels. This suggests adaptive STA/LTA fractal dimension may be less sensitive to analyst parameter choices than other methods. The proposed algorithm was verified using seismic traces and synthesized seismic traces with different noise levels. Also, the STA/LTA and STA/LTA fractal dimension algorithms are performed on a shot gather acquired in a seismic project in the west of Iran. The results emphasize that the proposed approach is quite practical and reliable for noisy and bad seismic traces. Also, this algorithm is computationally efficient and easy to apply.
- Boschetti, F., Dentith, M.D. and List, R.D., 1996. A fractal-based algorithm for
- detecting first arrivals on seismic traces. Geophysics, 61: 1095-1102.
- Clark, M.W., 1986. Three techniques for implementing digital fractal analysis of
- particle shapes. Powder Technol., 46: 45-52.
- Coppens, F., 1985. First arrival picking on common-offset trace collections for
- automatic estimation of static corrections. Geophys. Prosp., 33: 1212-1231.
- Gelchinsky, B. and Shtivelman, V., 1983. Automatic picking of first arrivals and
- parameterization of traveltime curves. Geophys. Prosp., 31: 915-928.
- Hatherly, P., 1982. A computer method for determining seismic first arrival times.
- Geophysics, 47: 1431-1436.
- Jiao, L. and Moon, W.M., 2000. Detection of seismic refraction signals using a
- variance fractal dimension technique. Geophysics, 65: 286-292.
- Murat, M., and Rudman, A., 1992. Automated first arrival picking: A neural network
- approach. Geophysics, 40: 587-604.
- Mandelbrot, B.B., 1975. Stochastic models for the Earth’s relief, the shape and the
- fractal dimension of the coastlines, and the number-area rule for islands. Proc. Natl.
- Acad. Sci. Am. 72: 3825-3828.
- Mandelbrot, B.B. and Pignoni, R., 1983. The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Vol. 173.
- W.H. Freeman, New York.
- Peraldi, R. and Clement, A., 1972. Digital processing of refraction data, study of first
- arrival. Geophys. Prosp., 20: 529-548.
- Sabbione, J.I. and Velis, D.R., 2010. Automatic first-breaks picking: New strategies
- and algorithms. Geophysics, 75(4): V67-V76.
- Sabbione, J.I. and Velis, D.R., 2013. A robust method for microseismic event detection
- based on automatic phase pickers, J. Appl. Geophys., 99: 42-50.
- Spagnolini, U., 1991. Adaptive picking of refracted first arrivals. Geophys. Prosp., 39:
- 293-312.
- Tibuleac, I.M., Herrin, E.T., Britton, JM. Shumway, R. and Rosca, A.C., 2003.
- Automatic secondary seismic phase picking using wavelet transform. Proc. 25th
- Seismic Research Review (SRR-03), Nuclear Explosion Monitoring: Building the
- Knowledge Base, Session 3-04, 352-359.
- Turcotte, D.L., 1992. Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics. Cambridge
- University Press, Cambridge: 73-94.
- Yang, S.K. and Ikelle, L.T., 1997. An example of seismic time picking by third-order
- biocoherence. Geophysics, 62: 1947-1951.
- Yilmaz, O., 2001. Seismic Data Analysis: Processing, Inversion, and Interpretation of
- Seismic Data. SEG Investigation in Geophysics, 10. SEG, Tulsa, OK.
- Zhang, J., Tang, Y. and Li, H., 2018. STA/LTA Fractal dimension algorithm of
- detecting the P-wave arrival. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 108: 230-237.
