ARTICLE

The importance of fracture toughness in the estimation of seismic anisotropy and stress orientation in shale formations

RITESH KUMAR SHARMA SATINDER CHOPRA
Show Less
TGS Canada, 250 5th Street SW, Suite 2100, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 0R4,
SamiGeo Consulting Ltd., 9062 Scurfield Drive NW, Calgary, Canada T3L 1W3,
JSE 2021, 30(5), 405–418;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Shale resource plays are associated with low permeability, and hence hydraulic fracturing is required for their stimulation and production. The effectiveness of hydraulic fracturing depends on how accurately a horizontal well is placed in the formation of interest. The direction of maximum stress and the magnitude of seismic anisotropy play an important role in the placement of a horizontal well, and effective hydraulic fracture stimulations along its length. Therefore, their estimation from seismic data can provide valuable information. While the source of seismic anisotropy is non-unique, fracture induced anisotropy as well as stress induced anisotropy are considered for an estimation of maximum stress direction and magnitude of seismic anisotropy. In this paper, we first introduce the concept of fracture toughness, which refers to the the ability of a rock to resist fracturing and propagation of pre-existing fractures. We then propose a workflow that uses its azimuthal variation for estimating these two parameters on seismic datasets from the Anadarko Basin. After estimating the maximum stress direction and magnitude of seismic anisotropy the available borehole breakout data as well as microseismic data for area of study are brought into consideration for authenticating the maximum stress direction analysis. The dipole shear logs measured at one well are used to validate the estimation for magnitude of seismic anisotropy.

Keywords
fracture toughness
fracture intensity
anisotropy
stress orientation
shale reservoirs
azimuthal-velocity variation
azimuthal-amplitude variation
maximum-stress
minimum-stress
Woodford
References
  1. Alt, R.C. and Zoback, M.D., 2015. A detailed Oklahoma stress map for induced
  2. seismicity mitigation, Search and Discovery article #70198 accessed at
  3. http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/pdfz/documents/2015/70198alt/ndx_alt.pdf.
  4. html on 6th June 2019.
  5. Barry, N., Whittaker, N.R. and Singh, S.G., 1992. Rock Fracture Mechanics Principles
  6. Design and Applications. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam-New York.
  7. Brown, E., Thomas, R. and Milne, A., 1990. The challenge of completion and stimulating
  8. horizontal wells: Oilfield Rev., 2(3): 52-64.
  9. Crosby, D.G., Yang, Z. and Rahman, S.S., 1998. Transversely fractured horizontal wells.
  10. SPE Ann. Techn. Conf., SPE, 50093.
  11. Eaton, D.W., 2018. Passive Seismic Monitoring of Induced Seismicity. Cambridge
  12. University Press, Cambridge.
  13. Gray, D., Anderson, P., Logel, J., Delbecq, F., Schmidt, D. and Schmid, R., 2012.
  14. Estimation of stress and geomechanical properties using 3D seismic data. First
  15. Break, 30: 59-68.
  16. Gray, D., Schmidt, D. and Delbecq, F., 2010. Optimize shale gas field development using
  17. stresses and rock strength derived from 3D seismic data. SPE, 137315-MS.
  18. Grechka, V. and Tsvankin, I., 1998. 3D description of normal-moveout in anisotropic,
  19. inhomogeneous media. Geophysics., 63: 1079-1092.
  20. Grechka, V., Tsvankin, I. and Cohen, J. K., 1999. Generalized Dix equation and analytic
  21. treatment of normal-moveout velocity for anisotropic media, Geoph. Prosp., 47:
  22. 117-148.
  23. Griffith, A.A., 1920. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids, Philos. Trans.. Roy.
  24. Soc., A 221: 163-198
  25. Griffith, A.A., 1924. The theory of rupture. In: Biezeno, C.G. and Burgers, J.M. (Eds),
  26. Proc. 1st Internat. Congr. Appl. Mech., Delft. Drukkerij J. Waltman Jr.: 54-63.
  27. Hall, S.A., Kendall, JM. and Barkved, O.I., 2002. Fractured reservoir characterization
  28. using P-wave AVOA analysis of 3D OBC data. The Leading Edge, 21: 777-781.
  29. Hoeksema., R.N., 2013. Elements of hydraulic fracturing. Oilfield Rev., Summer, 25(2):
  30. 51-52.
  31. Miller, C., Water, G. and Rylander, E., 2011. Evaluation of production log data from
  32. horizontal wells drilled in organic shales. SPE, 144326.
  33. Miller, C., Rylander, E. and Calvej, J.L., 2010. Detailed rock evaluation and strategic
  34. reservoir stimulation planning for optimal production in horizontal gas shale
  35. wells. AAPG Internat. Conf., Calgary, AB, Canada.
  36. Miller, C., Hamilton, D., Sturm, S., Waters, G., Taylor, T., Calvez, J.L. and Singh, M.,
  37. Evaluating the impact of mineralogy, natural fractures and in situ stresses
  38. on hydraulically induced fracture system geometry in horizontal shale wells. SPE,
  39. Miller, C., Water, G. and Rylander, E., 2011. Evaluation of production log data from
  40. horizontal wells drilled in organic shales. SPE, 144326.
  41. Plahn, S.V., Nolte, K.G., Thompson, L.G. and Miska, S., 1995. A quantitative
  42. investigation of the fracture pump-in/flowback test. SPE Ann. Techn. Conf., SPE
  43. Rocha-Rangel, E., 2011. fracture toughness determinations by means of indentation
  44. fracture, nanocomposites with unique properties and applications in medicine and
  45. industry. Cuppoletti, J. (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-351-4, InTech, Available from:
  46. https://www.intechopen.com/books/nanocomposites-with-unique-properties-and-
  47. applications-in-medicine-and-industry/fracture-toughness-determinations-by-
  48. means-of-indentation-fracture.
  49. Riiger, A. and Tsvankin, L, 1997. Using AVO for fracture detection: Analytic basis and
  50. practical solutions. The Leading Edge, 10: 1429-1434.
  51. Sack, R.A., 1946. Extension of Griffith's theory of rupture to three dimensions. Proc.,
  52. Phys. Soc. London, 58: 729.
  53. Schoenberg, M., and Sayers, C.M., 1995. Seismic anisotropy of fractured rock.
  54. Geophysics, 60: 204-211.
  55. Sierra R., Tran, M. and Abousleiman, Y., 2010. Woodford Shale mechanical properties
  56. and the impacts of lithofacies. Proc. Symp. on the 44th US Rock Mechanics
  57. Symposium and 5th US-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium, Salt Lake City,
  58. Utah, 27-30 June, ARMA-10-461,10p.
  59. Sharma, R.K., Chopra, S. and Lines, L.R., 2019. Replacing conventional brittleness
  60. indices determination with new attributes employing true hydrofracturing
  61. mechanism. Expanded Abstr., 89th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., San Antionio, 3235-
  62. Sneddon, I.N., 1946. The distribution of stress in the neighborhood of a crack in an
  63. elastic solid. Proc. Roy. Soc.: A, 187: 229.
  64. Sneddon, I.N. and Elliott, H.A., 1946. The opening of a Griffith crack under internal
  65. pressure. Quart. Appl. Math., 4: 262.
  66. Singleton, S., 2009. The effects of seismic data conditioning on prestack simultaneous
  67. impedance inversion, The Leading Edge, 28: 772-781.
  68. Weng, X., 1993. Fracture initiation and propagation from deviated wellbores. SPE
  69. Ann. Techn. Conf. SPE, 26597.
  70. Yu, G., Zhang, Y. Wang, X., Liang, X., Liu, B., Singleton, S. and Smith, M., 2017.
  71. Seismic data gather conditioning for prestack seismic data inversion. Expanded
  72. Abstr., 87th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 36, 5074-5078.
  73. Zhang, J., 2016. Comprehensive reservoir characterization of the Woodford shale in parts
  74. of Garfield and Kingfisher counties, Oklahoma. M.Sc. thesis, Univ. of Oklahoma.
  75. Zheng, X., 2006. Seismic azimuthal anisotropy and fracture analysis from p-p reflection
  76. data. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Calgary, Calgary.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing