ARTICLE

Multi-scale inversion of subsurface data aimed at characterizing heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs

ALIREZA SHAHIN1 MIKE MYERS2 PAUL STOFFA3 LORI HATHON2
Show Less
1 Department of Geology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran, arshah2013@gmail.com,
2 University of Houston, Cullen College of Engineering, Houston, TX 77204, U.S.A.,
3 University of Texas at Austin, Institute for Geophysics, Austin, TX 78758, U.S.A.,
JSE 2021, 30(4), 319–345;
Submitted: 26 November 2020 | Accepted: 17 March 2021 | Published: 1 August 2021
© 2021 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Shahin, A., Myers, M.T., Stoffa, P.L. and Hathon, L.A., 2021. Multi-scale inversion of subsurface data aimed at characterizing heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs. Journal of Seismic Exploration, 30: 319-345. Inverting single-scale subsurface data have been adequately addressed in literature. Nevertheless, multi-scale inversion have not been broadly studied to fully characterize heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs. To address multi-scale inversion for carbonates, our research deals with core plugs, well logs and seismic data in the following three sequential stages: ‧ On the core scale, we make three independent porosity measurements (Archimedes, CT, and NMR). Measuring electrical resistivity, P- & S-wave velocities on brine saturated core plugs along with joint modeling of the same properties using staged differential effective medium (SDEM) theory, help us to fine tune the model parameters through a global optimization algorithm. Core-calibrated multi-physics rock model provides micro- & macro-porosities which are consistent with NMR and /CT derived porosities. ‧ Next, we extend the technique from core to well log scale and demonstrate it using constructed logs from a real carbonate formation. In this stage, we integrate mass balance equations to model bulk density and SDEM theory to model elastic and electrical resistivity of dual-porosity carbonates. We design a stochastic global algorithm to simultaneously invert petrophysical properties. By constructing a dual-porosity formation, we demonstrate that the proposed workflow recovers the petrophysical properties. 0963-065 1/21/$5.00 © 2021 Geophysical Press Ltd. 320 ¢ Finally in the third stage, we propose an inversion algorithm in seismic scale to simultaneously retrieve P&S-wave velocities and density. Similar to core- & log-scale stages, Very fast simulated annealing (VFSA) is the special global optimization algorithm employed to minimize objective function. The optimization algorithm is stochastic in nature and is enable to estimate uncertainty in model parameters. Unlike commercial software, no assumption is made on correlations between P&S-wave velocities and density. No smoothed background model is needed and only bounds on model parameters are necessary.

Keywords
multi-scale
inversion
carbonate
stochastic
optimization
References
  1. Archie, G.E., 1962. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoircharacteristics. Transact. AIME, 146: 54-67.
  2. Avseth, P., Mukerji, T. and Mavko, G., 2005. Quantitative Seismic Interpretation.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  3. Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., Jorstad, A., Mavko, G. and Veggeland, T., 2001. Seismicreservoir mapping from 3-D AVO in a North Sea turbidite system. Geophysics,66: 1157-1176.
  4. Bruggeman, D.A.G., 1935. Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten vonheterogenen Substanzen. I. Dielektrizitatskonstanten und Leitfahigkeiten der
  5. Mischkérper aus Isotropen Substanzen. Annalen Physik, 416: 636-664.
  6. Ellis, D. and Singer, J., 2007. Well Logging for Earth Scientists, 2nd Ed. Springer Verlag,New York.
  7. Fournier, F., 1989. Extraction of quantitative geologic information from seismic datawith multidimensional statistical analysis: Part I, methodology, and Part II, a casestudy. Expanded Abstr., 59th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Dallas: 726-733.
  8. Gassmann, F., 1951. Uber die Elastizitit an Porésen Medien. Vierteljahrsschrift derNaturforschenden Gesellschaft, 96: 1-23.
  9. Hampson, D.P., Schuelke, J.S. and Quirein, J.A., 2001. Use of multiattribute transformsto predict log properties from seismic data. Geophysics, 66: 220-236.
  10. Ingber, L., 1989. Very fast simulated re-annealing. Mathemat. Comput. Modell., 12: 967-
  11. Ingber, L., 1993. Simulated annealing: Practice versus theory. Mathemat. Comput.Modell., 18: 29-57.
  12. Kennett, B.L.N., 1983. Seismic Wave Propagation in Stratified Media. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge.
  13. Mavko, G., Mukerji, T. and Dvorkin, J., 2020. The Rock Physics Handbook, 3rd Ed.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  14. Myers, M.T., 1989. Pore combination modeling: extending the Hanai-Bruggemanequation. SPWLA 30th Ann. Logging Symp., 1989-D.
  15. Myers, M.T., 1991. Pore combination modeling: A technique for modeling thepermeability and resistivity of complex pore systems. SPE Ann. Techn. Conf.,22662-MS.
  16. Myers, M.T. and Hathon, L.A., 2012. Staged differential effective medium (SDEM)models for the acoustic velocity in carbonates. Am. Rock Mechan. Assoc., 12-
  17. Mukerji, T., Jorstad, A., Avseth, P., Mavko, G. and Granli, J.R., 2001a. Mappinglithofacies and pore-fluid probabilities in a North Sea reservoir: Seismicinversions and statistical rock physics. Geophysics, 66: 988-1001.
  18. Mukerji, T., Avseth, P., Mavko, G., Takahashi, I. and Gonzalez, E.F., 2001b. Statisticalrock physics: Combining rock physics, information theory, and geostatistics toreduce uncertainty in seismic reservoir characterization. The Leading Edge, 20:
  19. Nur, A., Mavko, G., Dvorkin, J. and Gal, D., 1995. Critical porosity: the key to relatingphysical properties to porosity in rocks. Expanded Abstr., 65th Ann. Internat.SEG Mtg., Houston: 878.
  20. Raymer, L.L., Hunt, E.R. and Gardner, J.S., 1980. An improved sonic transit time toporosity transform. Expanded Abstr., 21st Ann. Logging Symp., Soc. Profess.Well Log Analys., P546.
  21. Sen, M.K. and Stoffa, P.L., 2013. Global Optimization Methods in Geophysical
  22. Inversion, 2nd Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  23. Shahin, A., Myers, M.T. and Hathon, L.A., 2020. Global optimization to retrieveborehole-derived petrophysical properties of carbonates. Geophysics, 85(3): D75-D82.
  24. Shahin, A., Stoffa, P.L. and Myers, M.T., 2020. Stochastic seismic-wavelet inversiontoward carbonate quantitative interpretation. Extended Abstr., 82nd EAGE Conf.,Amsterdam.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing