ARTICLE

A novel high-precision spectral decomposition method based on second-order synchrosqueezing transform and its application

ZHIWEI GUO SIYUAN CAO
Show Less
State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, CNPC Key Laboratory of Geophysical Exploration, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 18 Fuxue Road, Changping, Beijing 102249, P.R. China,
JSE 2020, 29(2), 159–172;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Guo, Z.W. and Cao, S.Y., 2020. A novel high-precision spectral decomposition method based on second-order synchrosqueezing transform and its application. Journal of Seismic Exploration: 29, 159-172. Spectral decomposition plays a central role in characterizing multicomponent signals, as for instance seismic signal, because it can reveals lots of valuable information hidden in the broadband seismic response. This paper presents a new methodology for seismic spectral decomposition via second-order synchrosqueezing transform. Second-order synchrosqueezing transform, which relies on a second-order local estimate of the instantaneous frequency, can provide a sharpened time-frequency representation while allowing for the separation and the reconstruction of the modes. We validate our method by means of a synthetic model and compare with the conventional spectral decomposition algorithms. Two field examples are employed to illustrate that the seismic attributes delineation using the second-order synchrosqueezing transform based method gives a better reflection of hydrocarbon-saturated reservoirs and stratigraphic characteristics.

Keywords
spectral decomposition
second-order synchrosqueezing transform
seismic signal
hydrocarbon detection
stratigraphic characteristics
References
  1. Allen, J.B., 1977. Short term spectral analysis, synthetic and modification by discrete
  2. Fourier transform. IEEE Transact. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., 25: 235-238.
  3. Castagna, J.P., Sun, S. and Siegfried, R.W., 2003. Instantaneous spectral analysis:
  4. detection of low-frequency shadows associated with hydrocarbons. The Leading
  5. Edge, 22: 120-127.
  6. Chen, S., Li, X. and Wu, X., 2014, Application of frequency-dependent AVO inversion to
  7. hydrocarbon detection. J. Seismic Explor., 23: 241-264.
  8. Chen, Y., Liu, T., Chen, X., Li, J. and Wang, E., 2014. Time-frequency analysis of
  9. seismic data using synchrosqueezing wavelet transform. J. Seismic Explor., 23:
  10. 303-312.
  11. Cohen, L., 1966. Generalized phase-space distribution functions. J. Math. Phys., 7:
  12. 781-786.
  13. Daubechies, I., Lu, J. and Wu, H.-T. W., 2011. Synchrosqueezed wavelet transform: An
  14. empirical mode decomposition-like tool. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Analis., 30:
  15. 243-261.
  16. Farfour, M., Wang, J., Jo, Y. and Wan, K., 2013. Spectral decomposition and reservoir
  17. engineering data in mapping thin bed reservoir, Stratton field, South Texas. J.
  18. Seismic Explor., 22: 77-91.
  19. Jeffrey, C. and William, J., 1999, On the existence of discrete Wigner distributions. IEEE
  20. Signal Process. Lett., 6: 304-306.
  21. Kodera, K., De Villedary, C. and Gendrin, R., 1976. A new method for the numerical
  22. analysis of non-stationary signals. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 12: 142-150.
  23. Li, C. and Liang, M., 2012. A generalized synchrosqueezing transform for enhancing
  24. signal time-frequency representation. Signal Process., 92: 2264-2274.
  25. Liu, W., Cao, S., Liu, Y. and Chen, Y., 2016. Synchrosqueezing transform and its
  26. applications in seismic data analysis. J. Seismic Explor., 25: 27-44.
  27. Liu, Y. and Fomel, S., 2013, Seismic data analysis using local time-frequency
  28. decomposition. Geophys. Prosp., 61: 516-525.
  29. Oberlin, T., Meignen, S. and Perrier, V., 2014. The Fourier-based synchrosqueezing
  30. transform. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process., ICASSP: 315-319.
  31. Oberlin, T., Meignen, S. and Perrier, V., 2015. Second-order synchrosqueezing transform
  32. or invertible reassignment? Towards ideal time-frequency representations. IEEE
  33. Transact. Signal Process., 63: 1335-1344.
  34. Odebeatu, E., Zhang, J. and Chapman, M., 2006. Application of spectral decomposition
  35. to detection of dispersion anomalies associated with gas saturation. The Leading
  36. Edge, 25: 206-210.
  37. Partyka, G., Gridley, J. and Lopez, J., 1999, Interpretational application of spectral
  38. decomposition in reservoir characterization. The Leading Edge, 22: 353-360.
  39. Radad, M., Gholami, A. and Siahkoohi, H., 2016. A fast method for generating high
  40. resolution single-frequency seismic attributes. J. Seismic Explor., 25: 11-25.
  41. Rioul, O. and Vetterlil. M., 1991. Wavelet and signal processing. IEEE Signal Process.
  42. Mag., 8: 14-37.
  43. Sinha, S., Routh, P., Anno, P. and Castagna, J.P., 2005. Spectral decomposition of
  44. seismic data with continuous-wavelet transform. Geophysics, 70: 19-25.
  45. Thakur, G. and Wu, H.-T., 2011. Synchrosqueezing-based recovery of instantaneous
  46. frequencyfrom nonuniform samples. SIAM J. Mathemat. Analys., 43: 2078-2095.
  47. Wu, X., Chapman, M., Wilson, A. and Li, X., 2014. Estimating seismic dispersion from
  48. prestack data suing frequency-dependent AVO analysis. J. Seismic Explor., 23:
  49. 425-429.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing