ARTICLE

Multiple subtraction using a hybrid least-squares filtering, non-linear weighting and complex curvelet domain approach

LIEQIAN DONG1,2 MUGANG ZHANG1 DEYING WANG2 YIMENG ZHANG1 CHANGHUI WANG1 ZHONG JIANG1
Show Less
1 BGP, CNPC, Zhuozhou 072751, P.R. China,
2 Key laboratory of Depositional Mineralization & Sedimentary Mineral of Shandong Province, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, P.R. China,
JSE 2018, 27(5), 433–444;
Submitted: 9 June 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 9 June 2025 | Published: 9 June 2025
© 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The study of de-multiple methods is a very important task in seismic data processing. For the typical prediction-subtraction methods, predicted multiples usually are never perfect and need adaption. However, considering the absence of orthogonality between predicted multiples and the primaries in the data, standard matching or subtraction methods often do not provide satisfactory results. To resolve this issue, primary/multiple separation via the curvelet domain has been introduced. However, the threshold methods based on the real curvelet transform (RCT) are sensitive to event positioning errors. In case of a slight event mispositioning, the amplitude of the RCT’s coefficients change dramatically. For that reason, a primary and multiple separation scheme based on least-squares (LS) matching and complex curvelet transform (CCT) is introduced in this paper. Firstly, the LS matching method is applied to do a rough amplitude matching and global time shift correction, then an optimal problem can be built and solved to correct the residual misfit in the CCT domain by taking advantage of the amplitude shift invariance property of the CCT. In addition, a non-linear primary protection masking process preserves most primaries during the process. Validation of this hybrid procedure on synthetic and field data shows that the primaries can be correctly recovered from the original data.

Keywords
de-multiple
prediction-subtraction
least-squares
shift invariance
complex curvelet transform
non-linear masking
References
  1. Candés, E.J. and Donoho, D.L., 2004. New tight frames of curvelets and optimal
  2. representations of objects with C2 Singularities. Commun. Pure Appl. Math, 57(2):
  3. 219-266.
  4. Dong, L.Q., Li, Z.C., Yang, S.C., Wang, D.Y. and Wang, J., 2013. Non-causal matching
  5. filter multiple elimination method based correlation and iteration. Chin. J. Geophys.
  6. (in Chinese), 56: 3542-3551.
  7. Fomel, S., 2009. Adaptive multiple subtraction using regularized nonstationary
  8. regression. Geophysics, 74(1), V25-V33.
  9. Donoho, D.L., 1995. Denoising via soft thresholding. IEEE Transact. Informat. Theory,
  10. 41: 613-627.
  11. Guitton, A., 2003. Multiple attenuation with multidimensional prediction-error filter.
  12. Expanded Abstr., 73th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Dallas: 57-74.
  13. Herrmann, F.J., Boeniger, U. and Verschuur, D.J., 2007. Nonlinear primary-multiple
  14. separation with directional curvelet frames. Geophys. J. Internat., 170: 781-799.
  15. Herrmann, F.J., Wang, D.L. and Verschuur, D.J., 2008. Adaptive curvelet-domain
  16. primary-multiple separation. Geophysics, 73(3): A17-A21.
  17. Kumar, V. and Herrmann, F.J.. 2009. Incoherent noise suppression with curvelet-domain
  18. sparsity. Expanded Abstr., 79th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg., Houston: 3356-3359.
  19. Lu, W.K., 2006. Adaptive multiple subtraction using independent component analysis.
  20. Geophysics, 71(5): S$179-S184.
  21. Neelamani, R., Baumstein, A.I., Gillard, D.G. and Hadidi, M.T., 2008. Coherent and
  22. random noise attenuation using the curvelet transform. The Leading Edge, 27: 240-
  23. Neelamani, R., Baumstein, A.I. and Ross, W.S., 2010. Adaptive subtraction using
  24. complex-valued curvelet transforms. Geophysics, 75(4), V51—V60.
  25. Rayan, S., Wang, D. L., Yilmaz, O. And Herrmann, F.J., 2007. Curvelet-based primary-multiple
  26. separation from a Bayesian perspective. Expanded Abstr., 77th Ann. Internat. SEG Mtg.,
  27. San Antonio: 2500-2504.
  28. Verschuur, D.J., Berkhout, A.J. and Wapenaar, C.P.A., 1992. Adaptive surface-related multiple
  29. elimination. Geophysics, 59: 1166-1177.
  30. Verschuur, D.J. and Berkhout, A.J., 1997. Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion,
  31. Part II : Practical aspects and examples. Geophysics, 62: 1596-1611.
  32. Wang, Y., 2003. Multiple subtraction using an expanded multi-channel matching (filter.
  33. Geophysics, 68: 346-354.
Share
Back to top
Journal of Seismic Exploration, Electronic ISSN: 0963-0651 Print ISSN: 0963-0651, Published by AccScience Publishing